Re: [PATCH 07/15] ftrace: fix event alignment: kvm:kvm_hv_hypercall

2011-03-09 Thread Avi Kivity
On 03/09/2011 01:55 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: Hi Avi, This patch set got lost in the shuffle, and I'm not looking to include it. Anything I need to do? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in the body

Re: [PATCH 07/15] ftrace: fix event alignment: kvm:kvm_hv_hypercall

2011-03-09 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 10:50 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: On 03/09/2011 01:55 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: Hi Avi, This patch set got lost in the shuffle, and I'm not looking to include Nasty typo: s/not/now/ it. Anything I need to do? Yeah, give me your Acked-by ;) -- Steve -- To

Re: [PATCH 07/15] ftrace: fix event alignment: kvm:kvm_hv_hypercall

2011-03-09 Thread Avi Kivity
On 03/09/2011 02:54 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 10:50 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: On 03/09/2011 01:55 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: Hi Avi, This patch set got lost in the shuffle, and I'm not looking to include Nasty typo: s/not/now/ Makes sense now. it.

Re: [PATCH 07/15] ftrace: fix event alignment: kvm:kvm_hv_hypercall

2011-03-08 Thread Steven Rostedt
Hi Avi, This patch set got lost in the shuffle, and I'm not looking to include it. On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 11:18 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: On 12/07/2010 11:16 PM, David Sharp wrote: I don't understand this. Can you elaborate? What does 32-bit addressable mean? The ring buffer

Re: [PATCH 07/15] ftrace: fix event alignment: kvm:kvm_hv_hypercall

2010-12-08 Thread Avi Kivity
On 12/07/2010 11:16 PM, David Sharp wrote: I don't understand this. Can you elaborate? What does 32-bit addressable mean? The ring buffer gives you space that is a multiple of 4 bytes in length, and 32-bit aligned. Therefore it is useless to attempt to align the structure beyond 32-bit

Re: [PATCH 07/15] ftrace: fix event alignment: kvm:kvm_hv_hypercall

2010-12-07 Thread Avi Kivity
On 12/06/2010 10:38 PM, David Sharp wrote: On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Avi Kivitya...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/04/2010 02:13 AM, David Sharp wrote: Signed-off-by: David Sharpdhsh...@google.com --- arch/x86/kvm/trace.h |8 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4

Re: [PATCH 07/15] ftrace: fix event alignment: kvm:kvm_hv_hypercall

2010-12-07 Thread David Sharp
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/06/2010 10:38 PM, David Sharp wrote: On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Avi Kivitya...@redhat.com  wrote:  On 12/04/2010 02:13 AM, David Sharp wrote:  Signed-off-by: David Sharpdhsh...@google.com  ---    

Re: [PATCH 07/15] ftrace: fix event alignment: kvm:kvm_hv_hypercall

2010-12-06 Thread David Sharp
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/04/2010 02:13 AM, David Sharp wrote: Signed-off-by: David Sharpdhsh...@google.com ---  arch/x86/kvm/trace.h |    8  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/trace.h

Re: [PATCH 07/15] ftrace: fix event alignment: kvm:kvm_hv_hypercall

2010-12-04 Thread Avi Kivity
On 12/04/2010 02:13 AM, David Sharp wrote: Signed-off-by: David Sharpdhsh...@google.com --- arch/x86/kvm/trace.h |8 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/trace.h b/arch/x86/kvm/trace.h index a6544b8..ab41fb0 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/trace.h