On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
mcg...@do-not-panic.com wrote:
Stephen, I'd like to respin this series to address all pending
feedback, I'd still like your feedback / call / judgement on this
part. I'm fine either way, just wanted to ensure I highlight the
reasoning of why
On 04/22/2014 03:41 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 08:10:56PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 20:15:25 -0700
Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@do-not-panic.com wrote:
As it is now if
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 08:10:56PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 20:15:25 -0700
Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@do-not-panic.com wrote:
As it is now if you add create a bridge it gets started
with a
On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 18:10 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Toshiaki Makita
makita.toshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
(2014/03/19 9:50), Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Toshiaki Makita
makita.toshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
nit,
If
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 08:10:56PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 20:15:25 -0700
Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@do-not-panic.com wrote:
As it is now if you add create a bridge it gets started
with a random MAC address and if you then add a net_device
as a slave but later
(2014/03/13 12:15), Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
From: Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com
As it is now if you add create a bridge it gets started
with a random MAC address and if you then add a net_device
as a slave but later kick it out you end up with a zero
MAC address. Instead preserve the
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Toshiaki Makita
makita.toshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
nit,
If the last detached port happens to have the same addr as
random_init_addr, this seems to call br_stp_change_bridge_id() even
though bridge_id is not changed.
Ah good point.
Shouldn't the assignment
(2014/03/19 9:50), Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Toshiaki Makita
makita.toshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
nit,
If the last detached port happens to have the same addr as
random_init_addr, this seems to call br_stp_change_bridge_id() even
though bridge_id is not
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Toshiaki Makita
makita.toshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
(2014/03/19 9:50), Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Toshiaki Makita
makita.toshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
nit,
If the last detached port happens to have the same addr as
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 20:15:25 -0700
Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@do-not-panic.com wrote:
As it is now if you add create a bridge it gets started
with a random MAC address and if you then add a net_device
as a slave but later kick it out you end up with a zero
MAC address. Instead preserve the
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Stephen Hemminger
step...@networkplumber.org wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 20:15:25 -0700
Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@do-not-panic.com wrote:
As it is now if you add create a bridge it gets started
with a random MAC address and if you then add a net_device
as a
From: Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com
As it is now if you add create a bridge it gets started
with a random MAC address and if you then add a net_device
as a slave but later kick it out you end up with a zero
MAC address. Instead preserve the original random MAC
address and use it.
If you
12 matches
Mail list logo
