On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 23:07:24 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 06:33:35PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > For default region layouts performance stays the same
> > as linear search i.e. it takes around 210ns average for
> > translate_desc() that inlines find_region().
>
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 06:33:35PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> For default region layouts performance stays the same
> as linear search i.e. it takes around 210ns average for
> translate_desc() that inlines find_region().
>
> But it scales better with larger amount of regions,
> 235ns BS vs 300n
For default region layouts performance stays the same
as linear search i.e. it takes around 210ns average for
translate_desc() that inlines find_region().
But it scales better with larger amount of regions,
235ns BS vs 300ns LS with 55 memory regions
and it will be about the same values when allow
