On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:49:31AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/28/2010 08:22 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >
> >that needs reinjection (or an exception).
> That can happen event now, no? A pending exception, interrupt comes
> along, injection picks up the exception but leaves the
On 07/29/2010 09:51 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 04:19:35PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
Instead of blindly attempting to inject an event before each guest entry,
check for a possible event first in vcpu->requests. Sites that can trigger
event injection are modified to set KVM_R
On 07/28/2010 08:22 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
that needs reinjection (or an exception).
That can happen event now, no? A pending exception, interrupt comes
along, injection picks up the exception but leaves the interrupt.
Now the situation can be more complicated:
- pending exception
- in
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 04:19:35PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Instead of blindly attempting to inject an event before each guest entry,
> check for a possible event first in vcpu->requests. Sites that can trigger
> event injection are modified to set KVM_REQ_EVENT:
>
> - interrupt, nmi window ope
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 07:53:32PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/28/2010 07:37 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 07:31:03PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> On 07/28/2010 07:21 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 04:19:35PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> In
On 07/28/2010 07:37 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 07:31:03PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/28/2010 07:21 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 04:19:35PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
Instead of blindly attempting to inject an event before each guest entry,
che
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 07:31:03PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/28/2010 07:21 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 04:19:35PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>Instead of blindly attempting to inject an event before each guest entry,
> >>check for a possible event first in vcpu->re
On 07/28/2010 07:21 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 04:19:35PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
Instead of blindly attempting to inject an event before each guest entry,
check for a possible event first in vcpu->requests. Sites that can trigger
event injection are modified to set KV
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 04:19:35PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Instead of blindly attempting to inject an event before each guest entry,
> check for a possible event first in vcpu->requests. Sites that can trigger
> event injection are modified to set KVM_REQ_EVENT:
>
> - interrupt, nmi window ope
Instead of blindly attempting to inject an event before each guest entry,
check for a possible event first in vcpu->requests. Sites that can trigger
event injection are modified to set KVM_REQ_EVENT:
- interrupt, nmi window opening
- ppr updates
- i8259 output changes
- local apic irr changes
- r
10 matches
Mail list logo