'tag' is just an abstraction to identify the command
from the driver. So we should make that explicit by
replacing 'tag' with a driver-defined pointer 'hba_private'.
This saves the lookup for driver handling several commands
in parallel.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke h...@suse.de
---
hw/esp.c
On 07/01/2011 09:42 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
'tag' is just an abstraction to identify the command
from the driver. So we should make that explicit by
replacing 'tag' with a driver-defined pointer 'hba_private'.
This saves the lookup for driver handling several commands
in parallel.
This
On 07/01/2011 10:27 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 07/01/2011 09:42 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
'tag' is just an abstraction to identify the command
from the driver. So we should make that explicit by
replacing 'tag' with a driver-defined pointer 'hba_private'.
This saves the lookup for driver
On 07/01/2011 10:27 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 07/01/2011 09:42 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
'tag' is just an abstraction to identify the command
from the driver. So we should make that explicit by
replacing 'tag' with a driver-defined pointer 'hba_private'.
This saves the lookup for driver
On 07/01/2011 03:11 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 07/01/2011 10:27 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 07/01/2011 09:42 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
'tag' is just an abstraction to identify the command
from the driver. So we should make that explicit by
replacing 'tag' with a driver-defined pointer
