Michael Alex et al -
Sorry for going quiet; I've been digesting the comments and researching
a
lot more stuff. I plan to release V5 shortly after 2.6.36 is out, highlights
will be:
1. Re-written pci config tables - using approach suggested by MST to clean
things up. Looking much
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 02:43:11PM -0700, Tom Lyon wrote:
+ vdev-mapcount--;
+ listener-mm-locked_vm -= mlp-npage;
Is there a race against mlock call here?
Alas, yes. I took another look at the related infiniband code, and now
have adopted their way of doing it.
Just make sure to
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 04:09:39PM -0700, Tom Lyon wrote:
On Monday, September 27, 2010 04:54:21 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 02:18:24PM -0700, Tom Lyon wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tom Lyon p...@cisco.com
Some comments on the pci bits:
After going over them for
On Monday, September 27, 2010 04:54:21 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 02:18:24PM -0700, Tom Lyon wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tom Lyon p...@cisco.com
Some comments on the pci bits:
After going over them for the Nth time - something needs to be done
with the rvirt/write
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 02:46:32PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 14:18 -0700, Tom Lyon wrote:
+ssize_t vfio_mem_readwrite(
+ int write,
+ struct vfio_dev *vdev,
+ char __user *buf,
+ size_t count,
+ loff_t *ppos)
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 02:57:49PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 13:54 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 02:18:24PM -0700, Tom Lyon wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tom Lyon p...@cisco.com
Some comments on the pci bits:
After going over them
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 12:09 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 02:46:32PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 14:18 -0700, Tom Lyon wrote:
+ssize_t vfio_mem_readwrite(
+ int write,
+ struct vfio_dev *vdev,
+ char __user
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 08:26:21AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 12:09 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 02:46:32PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 14:18 -0700, Tom Lyon wrote:
+ssize_t vfio_mem_readwrite(
+
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 16:40 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 08:26:21AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 12:09 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 02:46:32PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 14:18 -0700,
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:10:42AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 16:40 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 08:26:21AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 12:09 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 02:46:32PM
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 02:18:24PM -0700, Tom Lyon wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tom Lyon p...@cisco.com
Some comments on the pci bits:
After going over them for the Nth time - something needs to be done
with the rvirt/write tables. I doubt anyone besides me and you
has gone over them: one has to
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 14:18 -0700, Tom Lyon wrote:
+/*
+ * Pretend we're hardware and tweak the values
+ * of the *virtual* pci BARs to reflect the hardware
+ * capabilities
+ */
+static void vfio_bar_fixup(struct vfio_dev *vdev)
+{
+ struct pci_dev *pdev = vdev-pdev;
+ int bar;
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 14:18 -0700, Tom Lyon wrote:
+ssize_t vfio_mem_readwrite(
+ int write,
+ struct vfio_dev *vdev,
+ char __user *buf,
+ size_t count,
+ loff_t *ppos)
+{
+ struct pci_dev *pdev = vdev-pdev;
+
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 13:54 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 02:18:24PM -0700, Tom Lyon wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tom Lyon p...@cisco.com
Some comments on the pci bits:
After going over them for the Nth time - something needs to be done
with the rvirt/write tables.
14 matches
Mail list logo
