Hi Fengguang,
I understand the problem.
I will send you the URL for the powerpc git tree once my patches
are pulled in so that we can then pass that to the robot.
Thanks.
-suresh
On 11/01/2015 08:51 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Suresh,
>
> Sorry for the noise!
>
> Do you have a git tree that
On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 16:10 -0600, Suresh E. Warrier wrote:
> Hi Fengguang,
>
> I understand the problem.
>
> I will send you the URL for the powerpc git tree once my patches
> are pulled in so that we can then pass that to the robot.
The robot already knows about the powerpc next tree.
It
Hi Suresh,
Sorry for the noise!
Do you have a git tree that the robot can monitor and test?
In this case of one patchset depending on another, there is no chance
for the robot to do valid testing based on emailed patches.
Thanks,
Fengguang
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:16:06AM -0500, Suresh E.
Hi Suresh,
[auto build test ERROR on kvm/linux-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please
suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Suresh-Warrier/KVM-PPC-Book3S-HV-Optimize-wakeup-VCPU-from-H_IPI/20151030-081329
config:
This patch set depends upon a previous patch set that I had submitted to
linux-ppc. The URL for that is:
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2015-October/135794.html
-suresh
On 10/29/2015 11:52 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Suresh,
>
> [auto build test ERROR on kvm/linux-next
This patch adds support to real-mode KVM to search for a core
running in the host partition and send it an IPI message with
VCPU to be woken. This avoids having to switch to the host
partition to complete an H_IPI hypercall when the VCPU which
is the target of the the H_IPI is not loaded (is not
Hi Suresh,
[auto build test ERROR on kvm/linux-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please
suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Suresh-Warrier/KVM-PPC-Book3S-HV-Optimize-wakeup-VCPU-from-H_IPI/20151030-081329
config:
