> Thus it would be good to
> have kvm-unit-tests for all what is checked here.
I'll try to implement unit tests a bit later. The fixed patch based on
comments and critics from this thread is following.
> Indeed. Better have function than accepts the field index and that has
> some translation tab
On 2014-12-08 04:49, Wincy Van wrote:
+static bool vmx_msr_switch_area_verify(u32 count, u64 addr, int
maxphyaddr)
+{
+if (count == 0)
+return true;
+if ((addr & 0xf) != 0)
>>
>> Bits 11:0 have to be zero, in fact (page alignment required).
>
>
>
Sorry, please ignore the previous mail, It was rejected due to HTML format.
2014-12-07 18:21 GMT+08:00 Jan Kiszka :
>
> On 2014-12-07 10:46, Bandan Das wrote:
> > [Ccing a few others who might be interested]
> >
> > Hi Eugene,
> >
> > Did you look at the other patch that was posted for this functi
On 2014-12-07 10:46, Bandan Das wrote:
> [Ccing a few others who might be interested]
>
> Hi Eugene,
>
> Did you look at the other patch that was posted for this functionality
> by Wincy Van ?
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/21/749
It's good to see more momentum here, but, yes, we should defi
[Ccing a few others who might be interested]
Hi Eugene,
Did you look at the other patch that was posted for this functionality
by Wincy Van ?
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/21/749
Eugene Korenevsky writes:
> BitVisor hypervisor fails to start a nested guest due to lack of MSR
> load/store supp
BitVisor hypervisor fails to start a nested guest due to lack of MSR
load/store support in KVM.
This patch fixes this problem according to Intel SDM.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Korenevsky
---
arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h| 6 ++
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/msr-index.h | 3 +
arch/x86/inc
