On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 06:43:29 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:38:39AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:42:20 +0300
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:39:56PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > > This patchset a
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:38:39AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:42:20 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:39:56PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > This patchset aims to get us some way to implement virtio-1 compliant
> > > and transitional
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:38:39AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:42:20 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:39:56PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > This patchset aims to get us some way to implement virtio-1 compliant
> > > and transitional
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 02:37:08PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:38:39 +0200
> Cornelia Huck wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:42:20 +0300
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:39:56PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > > This patchset aims
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:38:39 +0200
Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:42:20 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:39:56PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > This patchset aims to get us some way to implement virtio-1 compliant
> > > and transitional devi
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:42:20 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:39:56PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > This patchset aims to get us some way to implement virtio-1 compliant
> > and transitional devices in qemu. Branch available at
> >
> > git://github.com/cohuck/qemu
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:39:56PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> This patchset aims to get us some way to implement virtio-1 compliant
> and transitional devices in qemu. Branch available at
>
> git://github.com/cohuck/qemu virtio-1
>
> I've mainly focused on:
> - endianness handling
> - extended
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 08:44:09AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2014-10-22 22:34, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:17 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> I thought about this again, and I'm not sure anymore if we can use
> >> ACPI
> >> to "black-list" the incompatible virtio de
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 07:34:16AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:17 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > I thought about this again, and I'm not sure anymore if we can use
> > ACPI
> > to "black-list" the incompatible virtio devices. Reason: hotplug. To
> > my
> > understa
On 2014-10-22 22:34, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:17 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> I thought about this again, and I'm not sure anymore if we can use
>> ACPI
>> to "black-list" the incompatible virtio devices. Reason: hotplug. To
>> my
>> understanding, the ACPI DRHD table
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:17 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> I thought about this again, and I'm not sure anymore if we can use
> ACPI
> to "black-list" the incompatible virtio devices. Reason: hotplug. To
> my
> understanding, the ACPI DRHD tables won't change during runtime when a
> device shows up or
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 04:17:40PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2014-10-22 10:44, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 11:04:28AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >> On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:24:22 -0700
> >> Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 10/07/2014 07:39 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote
On 2014-10-22 10:44, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 11:04:28AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:24:22 -0700
>> Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/07/2014 07:39 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
This patchset aims to get us some way to implement virtio-1 compl
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 11:04:28AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:24:22 -0700
> Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> > On 10/07/2014 07:39 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > This patchset aims to get us some way to implement virtio-1 compliant
> > > and transitional devices in qemu. Branc
On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:24:22 -0700
Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On 10/07/2014 07:39 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > This patchset aims to get us some way to implement virtio-1 compliant
> > and transitional devices in qemu. Branch available at
> >
> > git://github.com/cohuck/qemu virtio-1
> >
> > I've
On 10/07/2014 07:39 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> This patchset aims to get us some way to implement virtio-1 compliant
> and transitional devices in qemu. Branch available at
>
> git://github.com/cohuck/qemu virtio-1
>
> I've mainly focused on:
> - endianness handling
> - extended feature bits
> -
This patchset aims to get us some way to implement virtio-1 compliant
and transitional devices in qemu. Branch available at
git://github.com/cohuck/qemu virtio-1
I've mainly focused on:
- endianness handling
- extended feature bits
- virtio-ccw new/changed commands
Thanks go to Thomas for some p
17 matches
Mail list logo