On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 09:27:57AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
Rusty's currently doing some reorgs of -net let's delay
cleanups there to avoid stepping on each other's toys.
Let's focus on scsi here.
E.g. any chance framing assumptions can be
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 06:18:33PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 11:10:02PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 03:15:31PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:13:47AM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:20:24AM
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:13:47AM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:20:24AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 02:22:52PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:18:22AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 04:10:02PM
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 09:27:57AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
Rusty's currently doing some reorgs of -net let's delay
cleanups there to avoid stepping on each other's toys.
Let's focus on scsi here.
E.g. any chance framing assumptions can be
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 03:15:31PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:13:47AM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:20:24AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 02:22:52PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:18:22AM
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 11:10:02PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 03:15:31PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:13:47AM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:20:24AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 02:22:52PM
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
Rusty's currently doing some reorgs of -net let's delay
cleanups there to avoid stepping on each other's toys.
Let's focus on scsi here.
E.g. any chance framing assumptions can be fixed in 3.10?
I am waiting for your removal of the dma-compelete
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 02:22:52PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:18:22AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 04:10:02PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:16:59AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:17:28AM
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 02:27:50PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:06:15AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 04:47:15PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:33:30AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 04:10:02PM
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:20:24AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 02:22:52PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:18:22AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 04:10:02PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:16:59AM
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:23:12AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 02:27:50PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:06:15AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 04:47:15PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:33:30AM
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:18:22AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 04:10:02PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:16:59AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:17:28AM +0800, Asias He wrote:
Currently, vs-vs_endpoint is used
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:06:15AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 04:47:15PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:33:30AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 04:10:02PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:16:59AM
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:17:28AM +0800, Asias He wrote:
Currently, vs-vs_endpoint is used indicate if the endpoint is setup or
not. It is set or cleared in vhost_scsi_set_endpoint() or
vhost_scsi_clear_endpoint() under the vs-dev.mutex lock. However, when
we check it in
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:16:59AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:17:28AM +0800, Asias He wrote:
Currently, vs-vs_endpoint is used indicate if the endpoint is setup or
not. It is set or cleared in vhost_scsi_set_endpoint() or
vhost_scsi_clear_endpoint() under
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 04:10:02PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:16:59AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:17:28AM +0800, Asias He wrote:
Currently, vs-vs_endpoint is used indicate if the endpoint is setup or
not. It is set or cleared in
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:33:30AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 04:10:02PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:16:59AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:17:28AM +0800, Asias He wrote:
Currently, vs-vs_endpoint is used
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 04:47:15PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:33:30AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 04:10:02PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:16:59AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:17:28AM
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 04:10:02PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:16:59AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:17:28AM +0800, Asias He wrote:
Currently, vs-vs_endpoint is used indicate if the endpoint is setup or
not. It is set or cleared in
Currently, vs-vs_endpoint is used indicate if the endpoint is setup or
not. It is set or cleared in vhost_scsi_set_endpoint() or
vhost_scsi_clear_endpoint() under the vs-dev.mutex lock. However, when
we check it in vhost_scsi_handle_vq(), we ignored the lock.
Instead of using the vs-vs_endpoint
20 matches
Mail list logo