On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 07:06:08AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 05:59:32PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 05:30:53PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 01:43:58PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > We validate irq pin nu
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 05:59:32PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 05:30:53PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 01:43:58PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > We validate irq pin number when routing is setup, so
> > > code handling illegal irq # in pi
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 05:30:53PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 01:43:58PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > We validate irq pin number when routing is setup, so
> > code handling illegal irq # in pic and ioapic on each injection
> > is never called.
> > Drop it.
> >
> I
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 01:43:58PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> We validate irq pin number when routing is setup, so
> code handling illegal irq # in pic and ioapic on each injection
> is never called.
> Drop it.
>
I would leave BUG_ON there for a while.
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
We validate irq pin number when routing is setup, so
code handling illegal irq # in pic and ioapic on each injection
is never called.
Drop it.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
---
Reposting, applies without changes to kvm/next.
arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c | 16 +++-
virt/kvm/ioapic.c