On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:30:33PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 10:14:32PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 02:00:41PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
Since the arrival of posted interrupt support we can no
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 10:14:32PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 02:00:41PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
Since the arrival of posted interrupt support we can no longer guarantee
that coalesced IRQs are always reported to the IRQ
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 02:00:41PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
Since the arrival of posted interrupt support we can no longer guarantee
that coalesced IRQs are always reported to the IRQ source. Moreover,
accumulated APIC timer events could cause a busy
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
Since the arrival of posted interrupt support we can no longer guarantee
that coalesced IRQs are always reported to the IRQ source. Moreover,
accumulated APIC timer events could cause a busy loop when a VCPU should
rather be halted. The consensus is to