Joonsoo Kim writes:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 12:55:39PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Joonsoo Kim writes:
>>
>> > Currently, there are two users on CMA functionality, one is the DMA
>> > subsystem and the other is the kvm on powerpc. They have their own code
>> > to manage CMA reserved are
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 12:55:39PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Joonsoo Kim writes:
>
> > Currently, there are two users on CMA functionality, one is the DMA
> > subsystem and the other is the kvm on powerpc. They have their own code
> > to manage CMA reserved area even if they looks really s
Joonsoo Kim writes:
> Currently, there are two users on CMA functionality, one is the DMA
> subsystem and the other is the kvm on powerpc. They have their own code
> to manage CMA reserved area even if they looks really similar.
> From my guess, it is caused by some needs on bitmap management. Kv
Currently, there are two users on CMA functionality, one is the DMA
subsystem and the other is the kvm on powerpc. They have their own code
to manage CMA reserved area even if they looks really similar.
>From my guess, it is caused by some needs on bitmap management. Kvm side
wants to maintain bitm
