On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:11:45AM -0400, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> On 06/14/10 - 07:19:49PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 01:11:20PM -0400, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> > > We really want to "kvm_set_irq" during the hrtimer callback,
> > > but that is risky because that is durin
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 01:11:20PM -0400, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> We really want to "kvm_set_irq" during the hrtimer callback,
> but that is risky because that is during interrupt context.
> Instead, offload the work to a workqueue, which is a bit safer
> and should provide most of the same funct
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 01:11:20PM -0400, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> We really want to "kvm_set_irq" during the hrtimer callback,
> but that is risky because that is during interrupt context.
> Instead, offload the work to a workqueue, which is a bit safer
> and should provide most of the same funct
We really want to "kvm_set_irq" during the hrtimer callback,
but that is risky because that is during interrupt context.
Instead, offload the work to a workqueue, which is a bit safer
and should provide most of the same functionality.
Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette
---
arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c | 1
