On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 18:34 +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
PeterZ, is 7/7 alright to be picked?
Yeah, I guess it is.. I haven't had time to rework my tlb series yet
though. But these two patches
Hi Stefano,
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 12:23:37 +0100, Stefano Stabellini
stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 18:34 +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
PeterZ, is 7/7 alright to be
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
Hi Stefano,
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 12:23:37 +0100, Stefano Stabellini
stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 18:34 +0530, Nikunj A
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012, Nikunj A. Dadhania wrote:
From: Peter Zijlstra a.p.zijls...@chello.nl
get_user_pages_fast() depends on the IPI to hold off page table
teardown while they are locklessly walked with interrupts disabled.
If a vcpu were to be preempted while in this critical section, another
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:48:02 +0100, Stefano Stabellini
stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
I am also interested in introducing HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE on x86 for Xen.
Maybe we can pull our efforts together :-)
Giving a look at this patch, it doesn't look like it is introducing
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:48:02 +0100, Stefano Stabellini
stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
I am also interested in introducing HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE on x86 for Xen.
Maybe we can pull our efforts together :-)
Giving a look at this patch,
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 18:34 +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
PeterZ, is 7/7 alright to be picked?
Yeah, I guess it is.. I haven't had time to rework my tlb series yet
though. But these two patches together should make it work for x86.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 12:58:32 +0100, Stefano Stabellini
stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:48:02 +0100, Stefano Stabellini
stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
I am also interested in introducing
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 12:58:32 +0100, Stefano Stabellini
stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:48:02 +0100, Stefano Stabellini
stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 18:34 +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
PeterZ, is 7/7 alright to be picked?
Yeah, I guess it is.. I haven't had time to rework my tlb series yet
though. But these two patches together should make it work for x86.
Good. Do you
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 14:26 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 18:34 +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
PeterZ, is 7/7 alright to be picked?
Yeah, I guess it is.. I haven't had time to rework my tlb series yet
though. But
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 14:26 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 18:34 +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
PeterZ, is 7/7 alright to be picked?
Yeah, I guess it is.. I haven't had
From: Peter Zijlstra a.p.zijls...@chello.nl
get_user_pages_fast() depends on the IPI to hold off page table
teardown while they are locklessly walked with interrupts disabled.
If a vcpu were to be preempted while in this critical section, another
vcpu tearing down page tables would go ahead and
13 matches
Mail list logo
