On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:08:24PM -0500, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Christoffer Dall
c.d...@virtualopensystems.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 01:39:24PM -0500, Christoffer Dall wrote:
If you're going to bother commenting on a big long email, please
_CHOP OUT_ content which is not relevant to your reply. I paged down 5
pages, hit end, paged up, found no comment from you, so I'm not going to
bother reading anything further in this message.
Help your readers to read your email.
[...]
Agree. Lets merge it and change later. The vcpu run loop is simple
enough at this point. The question of using vcpu-requests is not
the question of real benefit though, of course you can introduce your
own mechanism to pass requests to vcpus instead of using whatever kvm
provides
[...]
read side RCU protects against is the memslots data structure as far
as I can see, so the second patch pasted below fixes this for the code
that actually accesses this data structure.
Many memory related functions that you call access memslots under the
hood and assume that locking is
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:42:02AM -0500, Christoffer Dall wrote:
[...]
read side RCU protects against is the memslots data structure as far
as I can see, so the second patch pasted below fixes this for the code
that actually accesses this data structure.
Many memory related functions
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:42:02AM -0500, Christoffer Dall wrote:
[...]
read side RCU protects against is the memslots data structure as far
as I can see, so the second patch pasted below fixes this for the code
that
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:40:37AM -0500, Christoffer Dall wrote:
[...]
Agree. Lets merge it and change later. The vcpu run loop is simple
enough at this point. The question of using vcpu-requests is not
the question of real benefit though, of course you can introduce your
own
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:17:06AM -0500, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:42:02AM -0500, Christoffer Dall wrote:
[...]
read side RCU protects against is the memslots data structure as far
as I
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 01:39:24PM -0500, Christoffer Dall wrote:
Provides complete world-switch implementation to switch to other guests
running in non-secure modes. Includes Hyp exception handlers that
capture necessary exception information and stores the information on
the VCPU and KVM
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 01:39:24PM -0500, Christoffer Dall wrote:
Provides complete world-switch implementation to switch to other guests
running in non-secure modes. Includes Hyp exception handlers that
capture necessary
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Christoffer Dall
c.d...@virtualopensystems.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 01:39:24PM -0500, Christoffer Dall wrote:
Provides complete world-switch implementation to switch to other guests
Provides complete world-switch implementation to switch to other guests
running in non-secure modes. Includes Hyp exception handlers that
capture necessary exception information and stores the information on
the VCPU and KVM structures.
The following Hyp-ABI is also documented in the code:
12 matches
Mail list logo
