On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:27:45AM +0200, xming wrote:
Newer versions of dhclient should also be OK: they detect
that checksum is missing in the packet. Try it e.g. with
a recent fedora guest as a client.
I don't have fedora, but with the latest release (4.1.1-P1) on isc.org
it still
Newer versions of dhclient should also be OK: they detect
that checksum is missing in the packet. Try it e.g. with
a recent fedora guest as a client.
I don't have fedora, but with the latest release (4.1.1-P1) on isc.org
it still behaves the same (see output at the bottom).
To solve the
Hi,
I think I am hitting this, in a weird way :D. Running 0.12.90,
vhost_net and kernel 2.6.35.4, I have troubles to get dhcp clients to
work except an old dhcp client pump seems to work out of the box.
Below are the output of dhcpcd, isc's dhcp client and busybox' udhcpc.
My dhcp server is in a
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 02:12:40PM +0200, xming wrote:
Hi,
I think I am hitting this, in a weird way :D. Running 0.12.90,
vhost_net and kernel 2.6.35.4, I have troubles to get dhcp clients to
work except an old dhcp client pump seems to work out of the box.
Below are the output of dhcpcd,
From: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:04:39 +0300
Since using the module involves updating the management tools
as well, if we go down this route it will be much less painful
for everyone to do push it upstream.
Ok, you can make your case to Patrick McHardy and if
On 06/29/2010 08:04 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:36:47AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Michael S. Tsirkinm...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:08:07 +0300
Userspace virtio server has the following hack
so guests rely on it, and we have to replicate
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 05:08:11PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/29/2010 08:04 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:36:47AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Michael S. Tsirkinm...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:08:07 +0300
Userspace virtio server has the
On 06/30/2010 05:31 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 05:08:11PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/29/2010 08:04 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:36:47AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Michael S. Tsirkinm...@redhat.com
Date:
From: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:08:07 +0300
Userspace virtio server has the following hack
so guests rely on it, and we have to replicate it, too:
Use port number to detect incoming IPv4 DHCP response packets,
and fill in the checksum for these.
The
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:36:47AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:08:07 +0300
Userspace virtio server has the following hack
so guests rely on it, and we have to replicate it, too:
Use port number to detect incoming IPv4
Userspace virtio server has the following hack
so guests rely on it, and we have to replicate it, too:
Use port number to detect incoming IPv4 DHCP response packets,
and fill in the checksum for these.
The issue we are solving is that on linux guests, some apps
that use recvmsg with AF_PACKET
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 01:08:07PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Userspace virtio server has the following hack
so guests rely on it, and we have to replicate it, too:
Use port number to detect incoming IPv4 DHCP response packets,
and fill in the checksum for these.
The issue we are
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 13:08 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Userspace virtio server has the following hack
so guests rely on it, and we have to replicate it, too:
Use port number to detect incoming IPv4 DHCP response packets,
and fill in the checksum for these.
The issue we are solving
13 matches
Mail list logo
