On 09/01/2014 03:52 AM, David Marchand wrote:
What about upgrading QEMU and ivshmem-server while you have existing
guests? You cannot restart ivshmem-server, and the new QEMU would have
to talk to the old ivshmem-server.
Version negotiation also helps avoid confusion if someone combines
On 08/28/2014 11:49 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 01:04:30PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 26/08/2014 08:47, David Marchand ha scritto:
Using a version message supposes we want to keep ivshmem-server and QEMU
separated (for example, in two distribution packages) while we
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 01:04:30PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 26/08/2014 08:47, David Marchand ha scritto:
Using a version message supposes we want to keep ivshmem-server and QEMU
separated (for example, in two distribution packages) while we can avoid
this, so why would we do so ?
Hello Stefan,
On 08/08/2014 05:02 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 10:55:18AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
+For each client (QEMU processes) that connects to the server:
+- the server assigns an ID for this client and sends this ID to him as the
first
+ message,
+- the
Il 26/08/2014 08:47, David Marchand ha scritto:
Using a version message supposes we want to keep ivshmem-server and QEMU
separated (for example, in two distribution packages) while we can avoid
this, so why would we do so ?
If we want the ivshmem-server to come with QEMU, then both are
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 10:55:18AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
+For each client (QEMU processes) that connects to the server:
+- the server assigns an ID for this client and sends this ID to him as the
first
+ message,
+- the server sends a fd to the shared memory object to this client,
