At 08/15/2012 04:53 AM, Marcelo Tosatti Wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:35:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:53:01PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:35:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Do you consider allowing support for Windows as overengineering?
I don't think there is a way to hook BSOD on Windows so attempting to
engineer something that works with Windows seems odd, no?
Yan says in other email that is
On Aug 14, 2012, at 10:35 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:53:01PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:55:54PM +0300, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
On Aug 14,
On Aug 15, 2012, at 12:56 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:35:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Do you consider allowing support for Windows as overengineering?
I don't think there is a way to hook BSOD on Windows so attempting to
engineer something that works with
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 05:24:52PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 01:48:39PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/13/2012 12:21 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:43:01AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
We can know the guest is panicked when the guest runs
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:47:48AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 05:24:52PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 01:48:39PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/13/2012 12:21 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:43:01AM +0800, Wen Congyang
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:29:38PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:47:48AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 05:24:52PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 01:48:39PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/13/2012 12:21 PM, Marcelo
Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:55:54PM +0300, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
On Aug 14, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-08-14 10:56, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 03:21:32PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08,
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:53:01PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:55:54PM +0300, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
On Aug 14, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-08-14 10:56, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Aug
Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:53:01PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:55:54PM +0300, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
On Aug 14, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-08-14
On 14 August 2012 19:53, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
Forget about !x86 platforms. They have their own way to do this sort of
thing. Think of this feature like a status LED on a motherboard. These
are very common and usually controlled by IO ports.
Please don't forget !x86
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:35:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:53:01PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:55:54PM +0300, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:35:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:53:01PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:59:06PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:35:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:53:01PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 08/13/2012 12:21 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:43:01AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
We can know the guest is panicked when the guest runs on xen.
But we do not have such feature on kvm.
Another purpose of this feature is: management app(for example:
libvirt) can do
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 01:48:39PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/13/2012 12:21 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:43:01AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
We can know the guest is panicked when the guest runs on xen.
But we do not have such feature on kvm.
Another purpose
16 matches
Mail list logo
