20.05.2010 11:15, Andre Przywara wrote:
Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
It'd be nice if we had more flexibility in defining custom machine types
so you could just do qemu -M win98.
This is wrong IMHO. win98 and winNT can run on various different
machines, including all modern ones (yes I tried the
On 05/19/10 15:34, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 05/19/2010 12:04 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> The idea is nice, but would it be possible to hold this on a week-end,
>> I personally won't be able to attend such thing on a day week.
>>
>> Or maybe holding that on two days: friday and saturday so that
On 05/19/10 02:58, Natalia Portillo wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> - We'll try to migrate as many confirmable bugs from the Source Forge
>> tracker to Launchpad.
> I think that part of the bug day should also include retesting OSes that
> appear in OS Support List as having bug and confirming if the bug is s
Michael Tokarev wrote:
20.05.2010 02:30, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 05/19/2010 05:29 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
Michael Tokarev wrote:
...
Also, thanks to Andre Przywara, whole winNT thing works but it requires
-cpu qemu64,level=1 (or level=2 or =3), -- _not_ with default CPU. This
[]
It'd be
20.05.2010 02:30, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 05/19/2010 05:29 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
Michael Tokarev wrote:
...
Also, thanks to Andre Przywara, whole winNT thing works but it requires
-cpu qemu64,level=1 (or level=2 or =3), -- _not_ with default CPU. This
[]
It'd be nice if we had more fle
On 05/19/2010 05:29 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
Michael Tokarev wrote:
...
Also, thanks to Andre Przywara, whole winNT thing works but it requires
-cpu qemu64,level=1 (or level=2 or =3), -- _not_ with default CPU. This
is also testing, but it's not obvious what to do witht the result...
Can't we
Michael Tokarev wrote:
...
Also, thanks to Andre Przywara, whole winNT thing works but it requires
-cpu qemu64,level=1 (or level=2 or =3), -- _not_ with default CPU. This
is also testing, but it's not obvious what to do witht the result...
Can't we use the file based CPU models for that? Actual
On 05/19/2010 09:52 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Tue, 18 May 2010 17:38:27 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Hi,
In an effort to improve the 0.13 release quality, I'd like to host a Bug
Day on June 1st, 2010. I've setup a quick wiki page with some more info
(http://wiki.qemu.org/BugDay/June2
Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
> []
> > For the Bug Day, anything is interesting IMHO. My main interest is to
> > get as many people involved in testing and bug fixing as possible. If
> > folks are interested in testing specific things like unusual or older
> > OSes, I'm happy to
On Tue, 18 May 2010 17:38:27 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In an effort to improve the 0.13 release quality, I'd like to host a Bug
> Day on June 1st, 2010. I've setup a quick wiki page with some more info
> (http://wiki.qemu.org/BugDay/June2010).
Tuesday is our call conf day and o
Hi,
>> There are a couple of.
>>
>> The majority of them are because SeaBIOS not behaving like real hardware
>> should and must do.
>>
>> If you know any OS that's not in the OS Support List and is broken please
>> commit.
>
> If something is broken, please file a bug against it. The OS Supp
Hi,
>>> There have been reports of several legacy OSes being unable to install
>>> or boot in the newer qemu while working in the older one. They're
>>> probably not in the "OS Support List" though. Are they effectively
>>> uninteresting for the purpose of the 0.13 release?
>>>
>
> For the
On 05/19/2010 12:04 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 05:38:27PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Hi,
In an effort to improve the 0.13 release quality, I'd like to host a
Bug Day on June 1st, 2010. I've setup a quick wiki page with some
more info (http://wiki.qemu.org/BugDay/J
On 05/19/2010 08:19 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
[]
For the Bug Day, anything is interesting IMHO. My main interest is to
get as many people involved in testing and bug fixing as possible. If
folks are interested in testing specific things like unusual or older
OSes, I
Anthony Liguori wrote:
[]
> For the Bug Day, anything is interesting IMHO. My main interest is to
> get as many people involved in testing and bug fixing as possible. If
> folks are interested in testing specific things like unusual or older
> OSes, I'm happy to see it!
Well, interesting or not,
On 05/18/2010 08:45 PM, Jamie Lokier wrote:
Natalia Portillo wrote:
Hi,
- We'll try to migrate as many confirmable bugs from the Source Forge tracker
to Launchpad.
I think that part of the bug day should also include retesting OSes that appear
in OS Support List as having
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> The idea is nice, but would it be possible to hold this on a week-end,
> I personally won't be able to attend such thing on a day week.
>
> Or maybe holding that on two days: friday and saturday so that people
> can participate at least on
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 05:38:27PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In an effort to improve the 0.13 release quality, I'd like to host a
> Bug Day on June 1st, 2010. I've setup a quick wiki page with some
> more info (http://wiki.qemu.org/BugDay/June2010).
>
> Here's my basic thinking:
>
Natalia Portillo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > - We'll try to migrate as many confirmable bugs from the Source Forge
> > tracker to Launchpad.
> I think that part of the bug day should also include retesting OSes that
> appear in OS Support List as having bug and confirming if the bug is still
> present a
Hi,
> - We'll try to migrate as many confirmable bugs from the Source Forge tracker
> to Launchpad.
I think that part of the bug day should also include retesting OSes that appear
in OS Support List as having bug and confirming if the bug is still present and
if it's in Launchpad or not.
--
To
20 matches
Mail list logo
