Re: [Bulk] RE: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch

2009-03-10 Thread Doug Schaefer
Dietmar Maurer wrote: I just wonder if 0.XX is a good name for a stable release. May is suggest to increase the major number (1.XX). It's not that stable Doug. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More

RE: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch

2009-03-09 Thread Dietmar Maurer
: qemu-de...@nongnu.org; kvm-devel Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch Avi Kivity wrote: In this case, the branch ought to be called stable_0_10, no? That's not a bad idea if everyone agrees that 0.10.1 is good stable naming convention. I was hoping to have

Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch

2009-03-09 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 11:12:47AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: Avi Kivity wrote: In this case, the branch ought to be called stable_0_10, no? That's not a bad idea if everyone agrees that 0.10.1 is good stable naming convention. I was hoping to have the first stable release about 2

Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch

2009-03-09 Thread Paul Brook
svn co svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/branches/stable_0_10_0 Will a stable release be called 0.10.0.1 or 0.10.1? (I'd prefer the latter) I was thinking the later but am open to suggestion. Definitely the latter. I think the branch is mis-named, it should be stable_0_10 (with 0_10_0,

Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch

2009-03-09 Thread Avi Kivity
Paul Brook wrote: svn co svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/branches/stable_0_10_0 Will a stable release be called 0.10.0.1 or 0.10.1? (I'd prefer the latter) I was thinking the later but am open to suggestion. Definitely the latter. I think the branch is mis-named, it

Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch

2009-03-09 Thread Anthony Liguori
Paul Brook wrote: svn co svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/branches/stable_0_10_0 Will a stable release be called 0.10.0.1 or 0.10.1? (I'd prefer the latter) I was thinking the later but am open to suggestion. Definitely the latter. I think the branch is mis-named, it

Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch

2009-03-08 Thread Avi Kivity
Anthony Liguori wrote: Hi, I'd like to announce the creation of a QEMU stable branch based on the recent 0.10.0 release. You can access it via anonymous SVN via: svn co svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/branches/stable_0_10_0 The stable branch will receive bug fixes from trunk until at

Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch

2009-03-08 Thread Anthony Liguori
Avi Kivity wrote: Anthony Liguori wrote: Hi, I'd like to announce the creation of a QEMU stable branch based on the recent 0.10.0 release. You can access it via anonymous SVN via: svn co svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/branches/stable_0_10_0 The stable branch will receive bug fixes

Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch

2009-03-08 Thread Anthony Liguori
Avi Kivity wrote: In this case, the branch ought to be called stable_0_10, no? That's not a bad idea if everyone agrees that 0.10.1 is good stable naming convention. I was hoping to have the first stable release about 2 weeks after the 0.10.0 release FWIW. There's already some good stuff