On 31 March 2014 20:57, Michael Roth wrote:
> Agreed, though I feel a little weird about creating releases for tags that
> aren't in the official repo. Would that be acceptable from a community
> stand-point? I'm honestly not sure.
>
> Otherwise I think Anthony/Peter would probably still need to p
Quoting Andreas Färber (2014-03-31 09:46:45)
> Am 31.03.2014 16:32, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> > On 31 March 2014 15:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> I think it would be a good idea to separate the committer and release
> >> manager roles. Peter is providing the community with a wonderful service,
> >
Anthony Liguori writes:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 31.03.2014 16:32, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>>> On 31 March 2014 15:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
I think it would be a good idea to separate the committer and release
manager roles. Peter is providing the
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 31.03.2014 16:32, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> On 31 March 2014 15:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> I think it would be a good idea to separate the committer and release
>>> manager roles. Peter is providing the community with a wonderful serv
Am 31.03.2014 16:32, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 31 March 2014 15:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> I think it would be a good idea to separate the committer and release
>> manager roles. Peter is providing the community with a wonderful service,
>> just like you were; putting too much work on his shou
On 31 March 2014 15:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> I think it would be a good idea to separate the committer and release
> manager roles. Peter is providing the community with a wonderful service,
> just like you were; putting too much work on his shoulders risks getting us
> in the same situation if
Il 31/03/2014 16:01, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
> "merge window" has been suggested before. I think it would be
> a terrible idea for QEMU, personally. We're not the kernel in
> many ways, notably dev community size and a greater tendency
> to changes that have effects across the whole tree.
>
>
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 31 March 2014 14:21, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> Another thing might be the release process in general. Currently it seems
>> that everybody tries to push everything just before the hard freeze. I had
>> to debug some problems introd
On 31/03/14 12:51, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 31.03.2014 12:40, schrieb Juan Quintela:
>>
>> Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.
>
> I would like to discuss the state of the QEMU release process, please:
>
> * -rc1 has not been tagged.
> * Who besides Anthony coul
On 31 March 2014 14:21, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Another thing might be the release process in general. Currently it seems
> that everybody tries to push everything just before the hard freeze. I had
> to debug some problems introduced _after_ soft freeze. Is there some
> interest in having
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:51:31PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 31.03.2014 12:40, schrieb Juan Quintela:
> >
> > Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.
>
> I would like to discuss the state of the QEMU release process, please:
>
> * -rc1 has not been tagged.
> * Who bes
Hi,
Am 31.03.2014 12:40, schrieb Juan Quintela:
>
> Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.
I would like to discuss the state of the QEMU release process, please:
* -rc1 has not been tagged.
* Who besides Anthony could upload a tarball if we tag and create it?
* make-release
12 matches
Mail list logo
