Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/09/2009 09:49 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
If I've just been sent an image produced by someone running KVM, and
my machine is not KVM-capable, or I cannot upgrade the KVM kernel
module because it's in use by other VMs (had this problem a few
times), there's no choice but
On 10/09/2009 09:49 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
If I've just been sent an image produced by someone running KVM, and
my machine is not KVM-capable, or I cannot upgrade the KVM kernel
module because it's in use by other VMs (had this problem a few
times), there's no choice but to change the
Glauber Costa wrote:
It ensures the two models are compatible. Since they're the same device
from the point of view of the guest, there's no reason for them to have
different representations or to be incompatible.
live migration between something that has in-kernel irqchip and
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 11:06:41AM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
Glauber Costa wrote:
It ensures the two models are compatible. Since they're the same device
from the point of view of the guest, there's no reason for them to have
different representations or to be incompatible.
Glauber Costa wrote:
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 11:06:41AM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
Glauber Costa wrote:
It ensures the two models are compatible. Since they're the same
device
from the point of view of the guest, there's no reason for them to have
different
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 05:48:31PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
Glauber Costa wrote:
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 11:06:41AM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
Glauber Costa wrote:
It ensures the two models are compatible. Since they're the same
device
from the point of view of the
Jamie Lokier wrote:
Glauber Costa wrote:
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 11:06:41AM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
Glauber Costa wrote:
It ensures the two models are compatible. Since they're the same device
from the point of view of the guest, there's no reason for them to have
On 10/08/2009 03:55 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Glauber Costa wrote:
This patch provides kvm with an in-kernel apic. We are currently not
enabling it.
The code is heavily based on what's in qemu-kvm.git.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa glom...@redhat.com
---
hw/apic.c | 135
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 04:09:27PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/08/2009 03:55 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Glauber Costa wrote:
This patch provides kvm with an in-kernel apic. We are currently not
enabling it.
The code is heavily based on what's in qemu-kvm.git.
Signed-off-by: Glauber
Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/08/2009 03:55 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
You should probably just setup VMState such that it directly saves
kvm_lapic_state and then have the pre/post functions call the kernel
ioctls to sync it. There's not a whole lot of point switching the
state between two
On 10/08/2009 04:26 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/08/2009 03:55 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
You should probably just setup VMState such that it directly saves
kvm_lapic_state and then have the pre/post functions call the kernel
ioctls to sync it. There's not a whole lot
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 04:31:57PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/08/2009 04:26 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/08/2009 03:55 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
You should probably just setup VMState such that it directly saves
kvm_lapic_state and then have the pre/post
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 09:39:13AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
The sync stuff is really ugly too. It would be much cleaner to have a
separate state for the in-kernel device models that saved the structures
from the kernel directly instead of having to translate between formats.
More
13 matches
Mail list logo
