Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Jes Sorensen wrote:
On 03/23/10 13:45, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I don't think we can pull in:
- extboot
- ia64
- in-kernel pit[1]
- associated command line options
- device passthrough
The question is, if we dropped those things, would people actually
use qemu.git
On 03/25/10 10:39, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
For ia64 part, maybe we can keep the current qemu-kvm.git for the users. And it
is not a must to push it into Qemu upstream.
Xiantao
Does it still build work? Does someone test it at least infrequently?
Or are there users?
There
Jes Sorensen wrote:
On 03/23/10 13:45, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I don't think we can pull in:
- extboot
- ia64
- in-kernel pit[1]
- associated command line options
- device passthrough
The question is, if we dropped those things, would people actually
use qemu.git instead of
On 03/23/10 13:45, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I don't think we can pull in:
- extboot
- ia64
- in-kernel pit[1]
- associated command line options
- device passthrough
The question is, if we dropped those things, would people actually use
qemu.git instead of qemu-kvm.git. If the answer is no, what
