On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@hallyn.com wrote:
I don't see this patch in the git tree, nor a revert of the buggy
commit. Was any decision made on this?
Blue Swirl posted a patch a few days ago:
[PATCH] pc: move port 92 stuff back to pc.c from pckbd.c
It hasn't been
Thanks, Stefan. That patch actually doesn't compile for me, because
it leaves references in hw/pckbd.c to both ioport92_write and
ioport92_read, which it deletes from there. Should ioport92_read
just be renamed to outport_read instead of delted, and the remaining
references changed to
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@hallyn.com wrote:
Thanks, Stefan. That patch actually doesn't compile for me, because
it leaves references in hw/pckbd.c to both ioport92_write and
ioport92_read, which it deletes from there. Should ioport92_read
just be renamed to
Hi,
I don't see this patch in the git tree, nor a revert of the buggy
commit. Was any decision made on this?
thanks,
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On 27.12.2010 04:51, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Peter Lievenp...@dlh.net wrote:
Am 25.12.2010 um 20:02 schrieb Peter Lieven:
Am 23.12.2010 um 03:42 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Peter Lievenp...@dlh.net wrote:
If I start a VM
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Peter Lieven p...@dlh.net wrote:
this was the outcome of my bisect session:
956a3e6bb7386de48b642d4fee11f7f86a2fcf9a is first bad commit
commit 956a3e6bb7386de48b642d4fee11f7f86a2fcf9a
Am 25.12.2010 um 20:02 schrieb Peter Lieven:
Am 23.12.2010 um 03:42 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Peter Lieven p...@dlh.net wrote:
If I start a VM with the following parameters
qemu-kvm-0.13.0 -m 2048 -smp 2 -monitor tcp:0:4014,server,nowait -vnc :14
-name
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Peter Lieven p...@dlh.net wrote:
this was the outcome of my bisect session:
956a3e6bb7386de48b642d4fee11f7f86a2fcf9a is first bad commit
commit 956a3e6bb7386de48b642d4fee11f7f86a2fcf9a
Author: Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com
Date: Sat May 22 07:59:01 2010
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Peter Lieven p...@dlh.net wrote:
Am 25.12.2010 um 20:02 schrieb Peter Lieven:
Am 23.12.2010 um 03:42 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Peter Lieven p...@dlh.net wrote:
If I start a VM with the following parameters
qemu-kvm-0.13.0
Am 27.12.2010 um 04:51 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Peter Lieven p...@dlh.net wrote:
Am 25.12.2010 um 20:02 schrieb Peter Lieven:
Am 23.12.2010 um 03:42 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Peter Lieven p...@dlh.net wrote:
If I
Am 23.12.2010 um 03:42 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Peter Lieven p...@dlh.net wrote:
If I start a VM with the following parameters
qemu-kvm-0.13.0 -m 2048 -smp 2 -monitor tcp:0:4014,server,nowait -vnc :14
-name 'ubuntu.test' -boot order=dc,menu=off -cdrom
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Peter Lieven p...@dlh.net wrote:
If I start a VM with the following parameters
qemu-kvm-0.13.0 -m 2048 -smp 2 -monitor tcp:0:4014,server,nowait -vnc :14
-name 'ubuntu.test' -boot order=dc,menu=off -cdrom
ubuntu-10.04.1-desktop-amd64.iso -k de
and select
12 matches
Mail list logo