On 08.09.2012, at 14:30, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08.09.2012, at 12:16, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 08.09.2012, at 10:06, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 08.09.2012, at 12:16, Blue Swirl wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08.09.2012, at 10:06, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/05/20
On 08.09.2012, at 12:16, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08.09.2012, at 10:06, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/05/2012 10:04 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>
> Reinventing a disasse
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 08.09.2012, at 10:06, Blue Swirl wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 09/05/2012 10:04 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
Reinventing a disassembler for ever growing x86 assembly is
no fun.
>>>
>>> W
On 08.09.2012, at 10:06, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 09/05/2012 10:04 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>>
>>> Reinventing a disassembler for ever growing x86 assembly is
>>> no fun.
>>
>> We can try linking to a disassembler library. I use udis86 to
>>
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 05.09.2012, at 15:38, Blue Swirl wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Anthony Liguori
>> wrote:
>>> Blue Swirl writes:
>>>
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Anthony Liguori
wrote:
> Avi Kivity writes:
>
>
On 05.09.2012, at 15:38, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Blue Swirl writes:
>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Anthony Liguori
>>> wrote:
Avi Kivity writes:
> On 09/05/2012 12:00 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>
>>> Why