On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 06:55:22AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
I think doing this makes the code much more readable. That's
borne out by the fact that this patch removes code. used
also happens to be the number that we need to return back to
the slab code when our shrinker gets called.
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 11:25 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
- if (used_pages kvm_nr_mmu_pages) {
- while (used_pages kvm_nr_mmu_pages
+ if (kvm-arch.n_used_mmu_pages goal_nr_mmu_pages) {
+ while (kvm-arch.n_used_mmu_pages goal_nr_mmu_pages
I think doing this makes the code much more readable. That's
borne out by the fact that this patch removes code. used
also happens to be the number that we need to return back to
the slab code when our shrinker gets called. Keeping this
value as opposed to free makes the next patch simpler.
