+static int dev_is_mpassthru(struct net_device *dev)
bool return value should be better here.
--
Regards，
Changli Gao(xiao...@gmail.com)
Thanks, would fix that.
Thanks
Xiaohui
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to
From: Xin Xiaohui xiaohui@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Xin Xiaohui xiaohui@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yu yzha...@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Jeff Dike jd...@linux.intel.com
---
include/linux/netdevice.h |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 5:19 PM, xiaohui@intel.com wrote:
+static int dev_is_mpassthru(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ if (dev dev-mp_port)
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
Please make it a inline function. And you would write it with less
lines of code.
return
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 5:19 PM, xiaohui@intel.com wrote:
+static int dev_is_mpassthru(struct net_device *dev)
bool return value should be better here.
--
Regards，
Changli Gao(xiao...@gmail.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to
From: Changli Gao xiao...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:33:02 +0800
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 5:19 PM, xiaohui@intel.com wrote:
+static int dev_is_mpassthru(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ if (dev dev-mp_port)
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
Please make it
From: Changli Gao xiao...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:35:01 +0800
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 5:19 PM, xiaohui@intel.com wrote:
+static int dev_is_mpassthru(struct net_device *dev)
bool return value should be better here.
Right.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
