2010/4/23 Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com:
On 04/23/2010 04:22 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I currently don't have data, but I'll prepare it.
There were two things I wanted to avoid.
1. Pages to be copied to QEMUFile buf through qemu_put_buffer.
2. Calling write() everytime even when we want to
On 05/03/2010 04:32 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
2010/4/23 Avi Kivitya...@redhat.com:
On 04/23/2010 04:22 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I currently don't have data, but I'll prepare it.
There were two things I wanted to avoid.
1. Pages to be copied to QEMUFile buf through
2010/5/3 Anthony Liguori aligu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com:
On 05/03/2010 04:32 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
2010/4/23 Avi Kivitya...@redhat.com:
On 04/23/2010 04:22 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I currently don't have data, but I'll prepare it.
There were two things I wanted to avoid.
1. Pages
On 05/03/2010 10:36 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
Great!
I also wanted to test with 10GE but I'm physically away from my office
now, and can't set up the test environment. I'll measure the numbers
w/ 10GE next week.
BTW, I was thinking to write a patch to separate threads for both
sender and
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 04/22/2010 10:37 PM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 04/21/2010 12:57 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
QEMUFile currently doesn't support writev(). For sending multiple
data, such as pages, using writev() should be more efficient.
Signed-off-by: Yoshiaki
On 04/22/2010 10:37 PM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 04/21/2010 12:57 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
QEMUFile currently doesn't support writev(). For sending multiple
data, such as pages, using writev() should be more efficient.
Signed-off-by: Yoshiaki
On 04/23/2010 04:22 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I currently don't have data, but I'll prepare it.
There were two things I wanted to avoid.
1. Pages to be copied to QEMUFile buf through qemu_put_buffer.
2. Calling write() everytime even when we want to send multiple pages
at once.
I think 2
On 04/21/2010 12:57 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
QEMUFile currently doesn't support writev(). For sending multiple
data, such as pages, using writev() should be more efficient.
Signed-off-by: Yoshiaki Tamuratamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Is there performance data that backs this up? Since
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 04/21/2010 12:57 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
QEMUFile currently doesn't support writev(). For sending multiple
data, such as pages, using writev() should be more efficient.
Signed-off-by: Yoshiaki Tamuratamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Is there performance data that
QEMUFile currently doesn't support writev(). For sending multiple
data, such as pages, using writev() should be more efficient.
Signed-off-by: Yoshiaki Tamura tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
buffered_file.c |2 +-
hw/hw.h | 16
savevm.c| 43
10 matches
Mail list logo
