This patch introduces a new config option for user controlled kernel
virtual machines. It introduces an optional parameter to
KVM_CREATE_VM in order to create a user controlled virtual machine.
The parameter is passed to kvm_arch_init_vm for all architectures.
Valid values for the new parameter
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 10:12 +0100, Carsten Otte wrote:
plain text document attachment (enable-ucontrol.patch)
This patch introduces a new config option for user controlled kernel
virtual machines. It introduces an optional parameter to
KVM_CREATE_VM in order to create a user controlled virtual
On 08.12.2011 10:25, Sasha Levin wrote:
Why is it s390 specific? why isn't it KVM_VM_UCONTROL which is currently
only implemented on s390?
Good point. Maybe the subject line for the patch should be fixed along
with that ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
On 12/08/2011 11:25 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 10:12 +0100, Carsten Otte wrote:
plain text document attachment (enable-ucontrol.patch)
This patch introduces a new config option for user controlled kernel
virtual machines. It introduces an optional parameter to
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 11:45 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/08/2011 11:25 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 10:12 +0100, Carsten Otte wrote:
plain text document attachment (enable-ucontrol.patch)
This patch introduces a new config option for user controlled kernel
virtual
On 12/08/2011 11:53 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 11:45 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/08/2011 11:25 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 10:12 +0100, Carsten Otte wrote:
plain text document attachment (enable-ucontrol.patch)
This patch introduces a new config
On 08.12.2011, at 10:59, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/08/2011 11:53 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 11:45 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/08/2011 11:25 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 10:12 +0100, Carsten Otte wrote:
plain text document attachment
On 08.12.2011 11:18, Alexander Graf wrote:
If you really have to do this, please
1) make it s390 only. I don't even want to have to see this uglyness in other
archs
It pretty much is. The only interference is a) checking the machine
type in arch_init_vm now that I've introduced that
On 12/08/2011 12:48 PM, Carsten Otte wrote:
On 08.12.2011 11:18, Alexander Graf wrote:
If you really have to do this, please
1) make it s390 only. I don't even want to have to see this
uglyness in other archs
It pretty much is. The only interference is a) checking the machine
type in
This patch introduces a new config option for user controlled kernel
virtual machines. It introduces a new ioctl named
KVM_S390_ENABLE_UCONTROL on the kvm file descriptor which allows for
a one way transition from a regular kernel virtual machine to a
user controlled virtual machine. The virtual
On 12/01/2011 02:57 PM, Carsten Otte wrote:
This patch introduces a new config option for user controlled kernel
virtual machines. It introduces a new ioctl named
KVM_S390_ENABLE_UCONTROL on the kvm file descriptor which allows for
a one way transition from a regular kernel virtual machine to
On 12/01/2011 03:15 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
+
+ if (kvm-arch.gmap)
+ gmap_free(kvm-arch.gmap);
+
+ kvm-arch.gmap = NULL;
Locking?
What happens if a vcpu is created afterwards?
Having read the code, I think you can repurpose the argument of
KVM_CREATE_VM to be a vm
On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 15:15:03 +0200
Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
+
+ if (kvm-arch.gmap)
+ gmap_free(kvm-arch.gmap);
+
+ kvm-arch.gmap = NULL;
Locking?
What happens if a vcpu is created afterwards?
I guess you don't mind too much since this is a privileged
13 matches
Mail list logo
