On 12/03/2010 05:44 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
Is there any reason why this patch is not yet in the stable kernel?
virtio_net is still crashing under heavy load in current vanilla kernel.
This patch *might be* the solution.
Perhaps some confusion. I've asked Greg to take kvm patches from
Marcelo
Am 04.06.2010 um 02:02 schrieb Bruce Rogers:
On 6/3/2010 at 04:51 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 04:17:34PM -0600, Bruce Rogers wrote:
>> On 6/3/2010 at 03:03 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 01:38:31PM -0600, Bruce Rogers wrote:
>virtio_net: Add
>>> On 6/3/2010 at 04:51 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 04:17:34PM -0600, Bruce Rogers wrote:
>> >>> On 6/3/2010 at 03:03 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 01:38:31PM -0600, Bruce Rogers wrote:
>> >> virtio_net: Add schedule check to napi_enable call
>> >>
>>> On 6/3/2010 at 04:51 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 04:17:34PM -0600, Bruce Rogers wrote:
>> >>> On 6/3/2010 at 03:03 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 01:38:31PM -0600, Bruce Rogers wrote:
>> >> virtio_net: Add schedule check to napi_enable call
>> >>
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 04:17:34PM -0600, Bruce Rogers wrote:
> >>> On 6/3/2010 at 03:03 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 01:38:31PM -0600, Bruce Rogers wrote:
> >> virtio_net: Add schedule check to napi_enable call
> >> Under harsh testing conditions, including low memory,
>>> On 6/3/2010 at 03:03 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 01:38:31PM -0600, Bruce Rogers wrote:
>> virtio_net: Add schedule check to napi_enable call
>> Under harsh testing conditions, including low memory, the guest would
>> stop receiving packets. With this patch applie
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 01:38:31PM -0600, Bruce Rogers wrote:
> virtio_net: Add schedule check to napi_enable call
> Under harsh testing conditions, including low memory, the guest would
> stop receiving packets. With this patch applied we no longer see any
> problems in the driver
