Il 18/07/2014 18:49, riccardo.brune...@dnshosting.it ha scritto:
> So, it should be ok to have the first two options, but also considering
> that with hyperthreading instead of 12 cores we can consider 24? Thus we
> can go with:
>
> 1) Assign vCPUs so that vCPU(VM1) + vCPU(VM2) = total number of c
Hi Paolo, thanks for the prompt reply.
On 2014-07-18 17:30, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 18/07/2014 15:06, Riccardo Brunetti ha scritto:
1) Assign vCPUs so that vCPU(VM1) + vCPU(VM2) = total number of
physical
cores (12) (both VMs have < 12 vCPUs) (ie. 8+4)
2) Assign vCPUs so that vCPU(VM1) + v
Il 18/07/2014 15:06, Riccardo Brunetti ha scritto:
>
>
> 1) Assign vCPUs so that vCPU(VM1) + vCPU(VM2) = total number of physical
> cores (12) (both VMs have < 12 vCPUs) (ie. 8+4)
> 2) Assign vCPUs so that vCPU(VM1) + vCPU(VM2) > total number of physical
> cores (12) (both VMs have <= 12 vCPUs) (
Dear KVM community people,
we are running on a kvm hypervisor with the following configuration:
CPU : Dual socket 6 cores: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2430 0 @ 2.20GHz
RAM : 48 GB
OS: CentOS release 6.5
2 very cpu intensive virtual machines and we are trying to find the best
way to optimize the av
