On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 08:27:09AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 21 May 2013 13:01:18 +0300
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:50:30AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
Hey Stephen,
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 02:24:31PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
Hey Stephen,
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 02:24:31PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
ioperm() inheritance across threads is different in KVM then when run
on physical hardware. The following program runs on physical hardware
but get SEGV under KVM.
It appears that the I/O permission bits are
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:50:30AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
Hey Stephen,
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 02:24:31PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
ioperm() inheritance across threads is different in KVM then when run
on physical hardware. The following program runs on physical hardware
but
On Tue, 21 May 2013 13:01:18 +0300
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:50:30AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
Hey Stephen,
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 02:24:31PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
ioperm() inheritance across threads is different in KVM then when run
ioperm() inheritance across threads is different in KVM then when run
on physical hardware. The following program runs on physical hardware
but get SEGV under KVM.
It appears that the I/O permission bits are not shared between threads
in the same way.
/* Original Copyright 2011, Kees Cook