Chris Wright wrote:
Porting is done by stable maintainers if it's trivial, push back to
developer/subsytem maintainer if it's not. Testing depends again, in
most cases the upstream testing is still valid. If not..."please
verify"
Warm, fuzzy feeling.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch tha
* Avi Kivity (a...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Chris Wright wrote:
>> * Avi Kivity (a...@redhat.com) wrote:
>>
>>> Does 'Cc: stable' mean -stable picks it up automatically? That
>>> doesn't seem right.
>>
>> Yes. If you add "Cc: sta...@kernel.org" to the commit message, it will
>> get routed to sta
Chris Wright wrote:
* Avi Kivity (a...@redhat.com) wrote:
Does 'Cc: stable' mean -stable picks it up automatically? That doesn't
seem right.
Yes. If you add "Cc: sta...@kernel.org" to the commit message, it will
get routed to stable when it's committed upstream (still gets human
tou
* Avi Kivity (a...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Does 'Cc: stable' mean -stable picks it up automatically? That doesn't
> seem right.
Yes. If you add "Cc: sta...@kernel.org" to the commit message, it will
get routed to stable when it's committed upstream (still gets human
touch, it's not automatically
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 12:02 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 08:08:23PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 14:01 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>
> >>> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >>>
> This is better.
>
> >>>
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 08:08:23PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 14:01 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
This is better.
Currently, this code path is posing us big troubles,
and we won't have a decent patch in time. So,
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 08:08:23PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 14:01 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > This is better.
> > >
> > > Currently, this code path is posing us big troubles,
> > > and we won't have a decent patch in time. So, temporarily
>
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 14:01 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > This is better.
> >
> > Currently, this code path is posing us big troubles,
> > and we won't have a decent patch in time. So, temporarily
> > disable it.
> >
> >
>
> Applied to master and kvm-updates/2.6.29, th
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
This is better.
Currently, this code path is posing us big troubles,
and we won't have a decent patch in time. So, temporarily
disable it.
Applied to master and kvm-updates/2.6.29, thanks.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubs
This is better.
Currently, this code path is posing us big troubles,
and we won't have a decent patch in time. So, temporarily
disable it.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti
Index: kvm/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
===
Currently, this code path is posing us big troubles,
and we won't have a decent patch in time. So, temporarily
disable it.
There's a module parameter for the adventurous who want to force
it.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c |7 ++-
1
11 matches
Mail list logo
