Re: KVM call minutes for Feb 1

2011-02-03 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 06:34:50PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: On 2011-02-01 18:20, Anthony Liguori wrote: On 02/01/2011 11:03 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: On 2011-02-01 17:53, Anthony Liguori wrote: On 02/01/2011 10:36 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: On 2011-02-01 16:54, Chris Wright wrote:

Re: KVM call minutes for Feb 1

2011-02-03 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 12:53:36PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 05:36:13PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: kvm_cpu_exec/kvm_run, and start wondering What needs to be done to upstream so that qemu-kvm could use that implementation?. If they differ, the reasons need to be

Re: KVM call minutes for Feb 1

2011-02-03 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 02/01/2011 06:53 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: I'd really prefer to let you finish up all the major work that way before starting massive revamping like the glib main loop. Yes, the glib main loop is not going to go anywhere if it cannot be applied to both qemu and qemu-kvm. (And, I

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Feb 1

2011-02-03 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 02/03/2011 04:11 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 06:34:50PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: On 2011-02-01 18:20, Anthony Liguori wrote: On 02/01/2011 11:03 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: On 2011-02-01 17:53, Anthony Liguori wrote: On 02/01/2011 10:36 AM,

Re: KVM call minutes for Feb 1

2011-02-03 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 02/03/2011 06:36 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: On 02/01/2011 06:53 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: I'd really prefer to let you finish up all the major work that way before starting massive revamping like the glib main loop. Yes, the glib main loop is not going to go anywhere if it cannot be

KVM call minutes for Feb 1

2011-02-01 Thread Chris Wright
KVM upstream merge: status, plans, coordination - Jan has a git tree, consolidating - qemu-kvm io threading is still an issue - Anthony wants to just merge - concerns with non-x86 arch and merge - concerns with big-bang patch merge and following stability - post 0.14 conversion to glib

Re: KVM call minutes for Feb 1

2011-02-01 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2011-02-01 16:54, Chris Wright wrote: KVM upstream merge: status, plans, coordination - Jan has a git tree, consolidating - qemu-kvm io threading is still an issue - Anthony wants to just merge - concerns with non-x86 arch and merge - concerns with big-bang patch merge and following

Re: KVM call minutes for Feb 1

2011-02-01 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 02/01/2011 10:36 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: On 2011-02-01 16:54, Chris Wright wrote: KVM upstream merge: status, plans, coordination - Jan has a git tree, consolidating - qemu-kvm io threading is still an issue - Anthony wants to just merge - concerns with non-x86 arch and merge -

Re: KVM call minutes for Feb 1

2011-02-01 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2011-02-01 17:53, Anthony Liguori wrote: On 02/01/2011 10:36 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: On 2011-02-01 16:54, Chris Wright wrote: KVM upstream merge: status, plans, coordination - Jan has a git tree, consolidating - qemu-kvm io threading is still an issue - Anthony wants to just merge

Re: KVM call minutes for Feb 1

2011-02-01 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 05:36:13PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: kvm_cpu_exec/kvm_run, and start wondering What needs to be done to upstream so that qemu-kvm could use that implementation?. If they differ, the reasons need to be understood and patched away, either by fixing/enhancing upstream or

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Feb 1

2011-02-01 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 02/01/2011 11:34 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: On 2011-02-01 18:20, Anthony Liguori wrote: On 02/01/2011 11:03 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: On 2011-02-01 17:53, Anthony Liguori wrote: On 02/01/2011 10:36 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: On 2011-02-01 16:54, Chris Wright wrote: