RE: [PATCH v2 0/3] Introduce MSI hardware mapping for VFIO

Hello! > I like that you're making this transparent > for the user, but at the same time, directly calling function pointers > through the msi_domain_ops is quite ugly. Do you mean dereferencing info->ops->vfio_map() in .c code? I can introduce some wrappers in include/linux/msi.h like

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Introduce MSI hardware mapping for VFIO

On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 16:16:54 +0300 Pavel Fedin wrote: Pavel, > Hello! > > > I like that you're making this transparent > > for the user, but at the same time, directly calling function pointers > > through the msi_domain_ops is quite ugly. > > Do you mean dereferencing

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Introduce MSI hardware mapping for VFIO

On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 16:16 +0300, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Hello! > > > I like that you're making this transparent > > for the user, but at the same time, directly calling function pointers > > through the msi_domain_ops is quite ugly. > > Do you mean dereferencing info->ops->vfio_map() in .c

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Introduce MSI hardware mapping for VFIO

On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 16:50 +0300, Pavel Fedin wrote: > On some architectures (e.g. ARM64) if the device is behind an IOMMU, and > is being mapped by VFIO, it is necessary to also add mappings for MSI > translation register for interrupts to work. This series implements the > necessary API to do