On 2013-04-26 18:07, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de wrote:
That's great but - as Gleb already said - unfortunately not yet usable.
I'd like to rebase my fixes and enhancements (unrestricted guest mode
specifically) on top these days, and
On 2013-04-25 10:00, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Nakajima, Jun jun.nakaj...@intel.com wrote:
Sorry about the slow progress. We've been distracted by some priority
things. The patches are ready (i.e. working), but we are cleaning them
up. I'll send what we have today.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de wrote:
That's great but - as Gleb already said - unfortunately not yet usable.
I'd like to rebase my fixes and enhancements (unrestricted guest mode
specifically) on top these days, and also run some tests with a non-KVM
guest.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Nakajima, Jun jun.nakaj...@intel.com wrote:
Sorry about the slow progress. We've been distracted by some priority
things. The patches are ready (i.e. working), but we are cleaning them
up. I'll send what we have today.
So, I have sent them, and frankly we are
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 01:00:42AM -0700, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Nakajima, Jun jun.nakaj...@intel.com wrote:
Sorry about the slow progress. We've been distracted by some priority
things. The patches are ready (i.e. working), but we are cleaning them
up. I'll
On 2013-03-22 17:45, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-03-22 07:23, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Nakajima, Jun jun.nakaj...@intel.com wrote:
I have some updates on this. We rebased the patched to the latest KVM
(L0). It turned out that the version of L1 KVM/Linux matters. At
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de wrote:
I don't have a full picture (already asked you to post / git-push your
intermediate state), but nested related states typically go to
nested_vmx, thus vcpu_vmx.
Ping regarding publication. I'm about to redo your porting
On 2013-04-24 17:55, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de wrote:
I don't have a full picture (already asked you to post / git-push your
intermediate state), but nested related states typically go to
nested_vmx, thus vcpu_vmx.
Ping regarding
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Nakajima, Jun jun.nakaj...@intel.com wrote:
I have some updates on this. We rebased the patched to the latest KVM
(L0). It turned out that the version of L1 KVM/Linux matters. At that
time, actually I used v3.7 kernel for L1, and the L2 didn't work as I
On 2013-03-22 07:23, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Nakajima, Jun jun.nakaj...@intel.com wrote:
I have some updates on this. We rebased the patched to the latest KVM
(L0). It turned out that the version of L1 KVM/Linux matters. At that
time, actually I used v3.7 kernel
On 2013-03-05 05:45, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de wrote:
On 2013-02-26 15:11, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013, Nakajima, Jun wrote about Re: [Bug 53611] New: nVMX:
Add nested EPT:
We have started looking at the pataches first
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de wrote:
On 2013-02-26 15:11, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013, Nakajima, Jun wrote about Re: [Bug 53611] New: nVMX:
Add nested EPT:
We have started looking at the pataches first. But I couldn't
reproduce the results
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013, Nakajima, Jun wrote about Re: [Bug 53611] New: nVMX: Add
nested EPT:
We have started looking at the pataches first. But I couldn't
reproduce the results by simply applying the original patches to v3.6:
- L2 Ubuntu 12.04 (64-bit) (smp 2)
- L1 Ubuntu 12.04 (64-bit) KVM
On 2013-02-26 15:11, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013, Nakajima, Jun wrote about Re: [Bug 53611] New: nVMX:
Add nested EPT:
We have started looking at the pataches first. But I couldn't
reproduce the results by simply applying the original patches to v3.6:
- L2 Ubuntu 12.04 (64-bit
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 08:43:13PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-02-26 15:11, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013, Nakajima, Jun wrote about Re: [Bug 53611] New: nVMX:
Add nested EPT:
We have started looking at the pataches first. But I couldn't
reproduce the results by simply
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com wrote:
On 2013-02-12 20:13, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
I looked at your (old) patches, and they seem to be very useful
although some of them require rebasing or rewriting. We are interested
in completing the nested-VMX features.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Nadav Har'El n...@math.technion.ac.il wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013, Jan Kiszka wrote about Re: [Bug 53611] New: nVMX: Add
nested EPT:
On 2013-02-11 13:49, bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53611
On 2013-02-12 20:13, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Nadav Har'El n...@math.technion.ac.il
wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013, Jan Kiszka wrote about Re: [Bug 53611] New: nVMX: Add
nested EPT:
On 2013-02-11 13:49, bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
https
On 2013-02-11 13:49, bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53611
Summary: nVMX: Add nested EPT
Product: Virtualization
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013, Jan Kiszka wrote about Re: [Bug 53611] New: nVMX: Add
nested EPT:
On 2013-02-11 13:49, bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53611
Summary: nVMX: Add nested EPT
Yikes, I didn't realize that these bugzilla
On 2013-02-11 14:27, Nadav Har'El wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013, Jan Kiszka wrote about Re: [Bug 53611] New: nVMX: Add
nested EPT:
On 2013-02-11 13:49, bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53611
Summary: nVMX: Add nested EPT
21 matches
Mail list logo
