On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 10:48:36AM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
Christoffer Dall writes:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 05:45:28PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 31 July 2014 17:38, Christoffer Dall christoffer.d...@linaro.org
wrote:
If we are not complaining when setting the pause value to
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 10:11:52AM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
Christoffer Dall writes:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 04:14:51PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
Christoffer Dall writes:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:55:12PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
To cleanly restore an SMP VM we need to
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 07:21:44PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 31/07/2014 19:04, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
On 31 July 2014 17:57, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 09/07/2014 15:55, Alex Bennée ha scritto:
To cleanly restore an SMP VM we need to ensure that the current pause
Christoffer Dall writes:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 07:21:44PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 31/07/2014 19:04, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
On 31 July 2014 17:57, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 09/07/2014 15:55, Alex Bennée ha scritto:
snip
No, it's not. It's just the state of
Christoffer Dall writes:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 04:14:51PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
Christoffer Dall writes:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:55:12PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
To cleanly restore an SMP VM we need to ensure that the current pause
state of each vcpu is correctly recorded.
Christoffer Dall writes:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 05:45:28PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 31 July 2014 17:38, Christoffer Dall christoffer.d...@linaro.org wrote:
If we are not complaining when setting the pause value to false if it
was true before, then we probably also need to wake up
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:55:12PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
To cleanly restore an SMP VM we need to ensure that the current pause
state of each vcpu is correctly recorded. Things could get confused if
the CPU starts running after migration restore completes when it was
paused before it state
Christoffer Dall writes:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:55:12PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
To cleanly restore an SMP VM we need to ensure that the current pause
state of each vcpu is correctly recorded. Things could get confused if
the CPU starts running after migration restore completes when it
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 04:14:51PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
Christoffer Dall writes:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:55:12PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
To cleanly restore an SMP VM we need to ensure that the current pause
state of each vcpu is correctly recorded. Things could get confused if
On 31 July 2014 17:38, Christoffer Dall christoffer.d...@linaro.org wrote:
If we are not complaining when setting the pause value to false if it
was true before, then we probably also need to wake up the thread in
case this is called from another thread, right?
or perhaps we should just
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 05:45:28PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 31 July 2014 17:38, Christoffer Dall christoffer.d...@linaro.org wrote:
If we are not complaining when setting the pause value to false if it
was true before, then we probably also need to wake up the thread in
case this
On 31 July 2014 17:50, Christoffer Dall christoffer.d...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 05:45:28PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
Consider the case where the reset state of the system is
CPU 0 running, CPUs 1..N stopped, and we're doing an
incoming migration to a state where all CPUs
Il 09/07/2014 15:55, Alex Bennée ha scritto:
To cleanly restore an SMP VM we need to ensure that the current pause
state of each vcpu is correctly recorded. Things could get confused if
the CPU starts running after migration restore completes when it was
paused before it state was captured.
On 31 July 2014 17:57, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 09/07/2014 15:55, Alex Bennée ha scritto:
To cleanly restore an SMP VM we need to ensure that the current pause
state of each vcpu is correctly recorded. Things could get confused if
the CPU starts running after migration
Il 31/07/2014 19:04, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
On 31 July 2014 17:57, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 09/07/2014 15:55, Alex Bennée ha scritto:
To cleanly restore an SMP VM we need to ensure that the current pause
state of each vcpu is correctly recorded. Things could get confused
On 31 July 2014 18:21, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
What does ARM do if you have a WFI while interrupts are disabled? On
x86 after cli;hlt only an NMI will wake you up. With spurious
wakeups, it's pretty much guaranteed that you will break such cli;hlt
sequences.
The
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 06:36:35PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 31 July 2014 18:21, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
What does ARM do if you have a WFI while interrupts are disabled? On
x86 after cli;hlt only an NMI will wake you up. With spurious
wakeups, it's pretty much
17 matches
Mail list logo
