On 09/07/2009 10:05 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 12:30 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 04:34:13PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
When adding a vector fails, the used counter should
not be incremented, otherwise on vector change we will
try
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 12:30 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 04:34:13PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
When adding a vector fails, the used counter should
not be incremented, otherwise on vector change we will
try to update the routing entry.
Signed-off-by:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:30:52PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 04:34:13PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
When adding a vector fails, the used counter should
not be incremented, otherwise on vector change we will
try to update the routing entry.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 04:22:36PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:30:52PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 04:34:13PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
When adding a vector fails, the used counter should
not be incremented, otherwise on