Re: [PATCH 0/9] msix/kvm integration cleanups

2010-10-06 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 06:05:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: On 09/20/2010 07:02 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 05:06:41PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: This cleans up msix/kvm integration a bit. The really important patch is the last one, which allows msix.o to be

Re: [PATCH 0/9] msix/kvm integration cleanups

2010-10-06 Thread Avi Kivity
On 10/06/2010 11:39 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 06:05:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: On 09/20/2010 07:02 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 05:06:41PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: This cleans up msix/kvm integration a bit. The really important

Re: [PATCH 0/9] msix/kvm integration cleanups

2010-09-21 Thread Avi Kivity
On 09/20/2010 07:02 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 05:06:41PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: This cleans up msix/kvm integration a bit. The really important patch is the last one, which allows msix.o to be part of non-target-specific build. I actually thoought this later

Re: [PATCH 0/9] msix/kvm integration cleanups

2010-09-21 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 06:05:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: On 09/20/2010 07:02 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 05:06:41PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: This cleans up msix/kvm integration a bit. The really important patch is the last one, which allows msix.o to be

Re: [PATCH 0/9] msix/kvm integration cleanups

2010-09-20 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 05:06:41PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: This cleans up msix/kvm integration a bit. The really important patch is the last one, which allows msix.o to be part of non-target-specific build. I actually thoought this later move should be done in a different way: - add all