On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:47:08AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009 01:03:30 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:00:02AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote
and perhaps consider
varargs for the callbacks (or would that be too horrible at the
implementation
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:47:08AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009 01:03:30 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:00:02AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote
and perhaps consider
varargs for the callbacks (or would that be too
On Wed, 13 May 2009 04:48:34 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Let's just add a helper function for the single vq case?
static inline struct virtqueue *virtio_find_vq(struct virtio_devide *vdev,
vq_callback_t *c, const char *n)
virtio_find_single_vq()
Am Tuesday 12 May 2009 00:19:32 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
This replaces find_vq/del_vq with find_vqs/del_vqs virtio operations,
and updates all drivers. This is needed for MSI support, because MSI
needs to know the total number of vectors upfront.
[...]
diff --git
On Sun, 10 May 2009 04:55:38 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 01:37:06PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
Yes, and in fact a rough look at your patch reveals that we don't
actually need del_vq: now we track them, we can just do that as part of
vdev destruction, right?
Let's
On Tue, 12 May 2009 07:49:32 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
This replaces find_vq/del_vq with find_vqs/del_vqs virtio operations,
and updates all drivers. This is needed for MSI support, because MSI
needs to know the total number of vectors upfront.
Sorry, is this not on top of my virtio_device
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:00:02AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Tue, 12 May 2009 07:49:32 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
This replaces find_vq/del_vq with find_vqs/del_vqs virtio operations,
and updates all drivers. This is needed for MSI support, because MSI
needs to know the total number
On Wed, 13 May 2009 01:03:30 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:00:02AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote
and perhaps consider
varargs for the callbacks (or would that be too horrible at the
implementation end?)
Thanks,
Rusty.
Ugh ... I think it will be. And AFAIK gcc
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 01:37:06PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
Yes, and in fact a rough look at your patch reveals that we don't actually
need del_vq: now we track them, we can just do that as part of vdev
destruction, right?
Let's assume that a driver encounters an error in probe
after it
Am Sunday 10 May 2009 06:07:06 schrieb Rusty Russell:
Yes, and in fact a rough look at your patch reveals that we don't actually
need del_vq: now we track them, we can just do that as part of vdev
destruction, right?
Some of my students are working on a test module for virtio. Its a driver
On Fri, 8 May 2009 10:18:22 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 04:37:06PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Thu, 7 May 2009 11:40:39 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
This replaces find_vq/del_vq with find_vqs/del_vqs virtio operations,
and updates all drivers. This is needed
On Thu, 7 May 2009 11:40:39 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
This replaces find_vq/del_vq with find_vqs/del_vqs virtio operations,
and updates all drivers. This is needed for MSI support, because MSI
needs to know the total number of vectors upfront.
Hmm, I have a similar need for a dev to vq
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 04:37:06PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Thu, 7 May 2009 11:40:39 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
This replaces find_vq/del_vq with find_vqs/del_vqs virtio operations,
and updates all drivers. This is needed for MSI support, because MSI
needs to know the total number
13 matches
Mail list logo
