Re: [PATCH 1/5] Implement #NMI exiting for nested SVM

2009-09-22 Thread Joerg Roedel
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 03:00:28PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: When injecting an NMI to the l1 guest while it was running the l2 guest, we didn't #VMEXIT but just injected the NMI to the l2 guest. Let's be closer to real hardware and #VMEXIT if we're supposed to do so. Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH 1/5] Implement #NMI exiting for nested SVM

2009-09-18 Thread Jan Kiszka
Alexander Graf wrote: When injecting an NMI to the l1 guest while it was running the l2 guest, we didn't #VMEXIT but just injected the NMI to the l2 guest. Let's be closer to real hardware and #VMEXIT if we're supposed to do so. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de ---

Re: [PATCH 1/5] Implement #NMI exiting for nested SVM

2009-09-18 Thread Alexander Graf
Am 18.09.2009 um 15:33 schrieb Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com: Alexander Graf wrote: When injecting an NMI to the l1 guest while it was running the l2 guest, we didn't #VMEXIT but just injected the NMI to the l2 guest. Let's be closer to real hardware and #VMEXIT if we're supposed to

Re: [PATCH 1/5] Implement #NMI exiting for nested SVM

2009-09-18 Thread Jan Kiszka
Alexander Graf wrote: Am 18.09.2009 um 15:33 schrieb Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com: Alexander Graf wrote: When injecting an NMI to the l1 guest while it was running the l2 guest, we didn't #VMEXIT but just injected the NMI to the l2 guest. Let's be closer to real hardware and