On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 16:20:43 -0200
Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
This is a cleanup that tries to solve two small issues:
- We don't need a separate kvm_pv_eoi_features variable just to keep a
constant calculated at compile-time, and this style would require
adding a
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 09:41:37AM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
[...]
Andreas, please ignore this patch (it is not necessary anymore as this
series doesn't include machine-type compatibility code for kvm_mmu).
Patches 2-7 don't depend on this patch and should apply cleanly without
it.
I
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 10:46:12AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 16:20:43 -0200
Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
This is a cleanup that tries to solve two small issues:
- We don't need a separate kvm_pv_eoi_features variable just to keep a
constant
