[ kvm-Bugs-1868937 ] eepro100.c:1570: nic_receive: Assertion `0' failed.

2011-01-07 Thread SourceForge.net
thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: qemu Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Philipp Morger (swissphoenix) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: eepro100.c:1570

[ kvm-Bugs-1868937 ] eepro100.c:1570: nic_receive: Assertion `0' failed.

2010-06-11 Thread SourceForge.net
thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: qemu Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Philipp Morger (swissphoenix) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: eepro100.c:1570: nic_receive

RE: eepro100.c

2009-09-22 Thread Michal Filka
Hi, I'm unable to build kvm from source on machine, where I run kvm virtualization. I've applied your patch to kvm-88 source. ./configure Error: libpci check failed Disable KVM Device Assignment capability. rm: cannot remove `include/asm': Is a directory rm: cannot remove `include-compat/asm':

RE: eepro100.c

2009-09-22 Thread Michal Filka
without installing? Thanks Michal Filka -Original Message- From: Stefan Weil [mailto:w...@mail.berlios.de] Sent: 19. září 2009 19:11 To: Filka Michal Cc: qemu-devel; kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: eepro100.c Stefan Weil schrieb: Jan Kiszka schrieb: Michal Filka wrote: Hi

Re: eepro100.c

2009-09-22 Thread Amit Shah
On (Tue) Sep 22 2009 [13:31:11], Michal Filka wrote: I don't want to corrupt present kvm installation, or better to say, I want to modify it as small as possible. Could you suggest me what should I replace or how to run new compilation instead of old one without installing? You can

Re: eepro100.c

2009-09-22 Thread Stefan Weil
Amit Shah schrieb: On (Tue) Sep 22 2009 [13:31:11], Michal Filka wrote: I don't want to corrupt present kvm installation, or better to say, I want to modify it as small as possible. Could you suggest me what should I replace or how to run new compilation instead of old one without

RE: eepro100.c

2009-09-22 Thread Michal Filka
Hi, I did a couple of tests. 1. test Kernel modules from distribution (kvm-72) new user space application (qemu-system-x86_64 - patched kvm-88) It seems that it is not working Possibilities: 1) ru is not ready because of other reason than switching to suspended state 2) patch is not working

RE: eepro100.c

2009-09-21 Thread Michal Filka
Hi up to now, nobody complained about the missing RNR interrupts. Linux obviously works without them, so I had no reason to implement them. ... I'm not complaining, I'm asking for help ;-) Virtualization is working - no problem. However, it turns emulated driver into suspended state under

Re: eepro100.c

2009-09-19 Thread Jan Kiszka
Michal Filka wrote: Hi, I have question on i82557b emulation in kvm. I have run a proprietary operating system (Pharlap OS) in kvm. Part of the job has been porting driver for i8255x. During the job I discovered that kvm's emulation doesn't support a RNR interrupt (it is disabled in the

Re: eepro100.c

2009-09-19 Thread Stefan Weil
Jan Kiszka schrieb: Michal Filka wrote: Hi, I have question on i82557b emulation in kvm. I have run a proprietary operating system (Pharlap OS) in kvm. Part of the job has been porting driver for i8255x. During the job I discovered that kvm's emulation doesn't support a RNR interrupt (it

Re: eepro100.c

2009-09-19 Thread Stefan Weil
2009 19:05:07 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] eepro100: Add RNR interrupt Set RNR (receive unit not ready) interrupt for RU abort command. Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil w...@mail.berlios.de --- hw/eepro100.c | 15 +++ 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/eepro100.c

eepro100.c

2009-09-17 Thread Michal Filka
Hi, I have question on i82557b emulation in kvm. I have run a proprietary operating system (Pharlap OS) in kvm. Part of the job has been porting driver for i8255x. During the job I discovered that kvm's emulation doesn't support a RNR interrupt (it is disabled in the code). Why is it