Re: kvm-unit-test failed to complete

2015-07-30 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 30/07/2015 06:41, Bandan Das wrote: diff --git a/x86/cstart64.S b/x86/cstart64.S index 8d0d95d..8d5ee2d 100644 --- a/x86/cstart64.S +++ b/x86/cstart64.S @@ -213,7 +213,11 @@ idt_descr: load_tss: lidtq idt_descr - mov $0, %eax + mov $0x10, %eax + mov

kvm-unit-test failed to complete

2015-07-29 Thread Shih-Wei Li
Hi all, This is Shih-Wei, I'm Christoffer's colleague at Columbia University. We have experienced some problems in running kvm-unit-tests in our environment. Here's what we did: ./configure make ./run_test.sh run_test.sh halted in some specific test items and couldn't finish the run. I managed

Re: kvm-unit-test failed to complete

2015-07-29 Thread Christoffer Dall
Hi Shih-Wei, [Something weird happened when sending these e-mails, you sent two where one seems to be a slight modification of the other?] On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:18:23PM -0400, Shih-Wei Li wrote: Hi all, This is Shih-Wei, I'm Christoffer's colleague at Columbia University. We have

Re: kvm-unit-test failed to complete

2015-07-29 Thread Shih-Wei Li
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Christoffer Dall cd...@cs.columbia.edu wrote: Hi Shih-Wei, [Something weird happened when sending these e-mails, you sent two where one seems to be a slight modification of the other?] yes, the previous one just got rejected by the mailing list. sorry about

Re: kvm-unit-test failed to complete

2015-07-29 Thread Bandan Das
Shih-Wei Li shih...@cs.columbia.edu writes: On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Shih-Wei Li shih...@cs.columbia.edu wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Christoffer Dall cd...@cs.columbia.edu wrote: Hi Shih-Wei, [Something weird happened when sending these e-mails, you sent two where one

Re: kvm-unit-test failed to complete

2015-07-29 Thread Shih-Wei Li
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Shih-Wei Li shih...@cs.columbia.edu wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Christoffer Dall cd...@cs.columbia.edu wrote: Hi Shih-Wei, [Something weird happened when sending these e-mails, you sent two where one seems to be a slight modification of the