Hi,
> Now, I've a question: what seabios implementation of extboot we're
> talking about?
seabios boots natively from virtio now, so for that use case extboot
isn't needed any more.
> -option-rom which is impossible to select as a first
> boot device?
'qemu-kvm -option-rom romfile=/root/rom
On 2012-01-15 15:29, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 03:21:45PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-01-15 14:39, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 01/15/2012 03:27 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 15.01.2012 17:18, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/15/2012 03:10 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 03:21:45PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-01-15 14:39, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 01/15/2012 03:27 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> >> On 15.01.2012 17:18, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>> On 01/15/2012 03:10 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> >> []
> FWIW, I had to patch extboot back i
On 2012-01-15 14:39, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/15/2012 03:27 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> On 15.01.2012 17:18, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 01/15/2012 03:10 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> []
FWIW, I had to patch extboot back in for debian qemu-kvm 1.0, because
of lack of boot support from scs
On 01/15/2012 03:27 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 15.01.2012 17:18, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 01/15/2012 03:10 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> []
> >> FWIW, I had to patch extboot back in for debian qemu-kvm 1.0, because
> >> of lack of boot support from scsi (and no alternative), and because
> >> ma
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 05:27:39PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 15.01.2012 17:18, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 01/15/2012 03:10 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> []
> >> FWIW, I had to patch extboot back in for debian qemu-kvm 1.0, because
> >> of lack of boot support from scsi (and no alternative), a
On 15.01.2012 17:18, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/15/2012 03:10 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
>> FWIW, I had to patch extboot back in for debian qemu-kvm 1.0, because
>> of lack of boot support from scsi (and no alternative), and because
>> many people's scripts who used boot= broke. I thought it is
On 01/15/2012 03:10 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 15.01.2012 16:53, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 01/15/2012 02:50 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> []
> >> extboot is history since 2a06024dc1b1e27b1be0266379af397e61b4a9ad
> >
> > Yeah, but it isn't history for people running older qemu-kvm's. We
> > don't ne
On 15.01.2012 16:53, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/15/2012 02:50 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
[]
>> extboot is history since 2a06024dc1b1e27b1be0266379af397e61b4a9ad
>
> Yeah, but it isn't history for people running older qemu-kvm's. We
> don't need extboot itself, but we do need to keep the boot option (as
On 01/15/2012 02:55 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Yeah, but it isn't history for people running older qemu-kvm's. We
> > don't need extboot itself, but we do need to keep the boot option (as
> > 2a06 does). The question is do we need to preserve its meaning too
> > (with the seabios implementation in
On 2012-01-15 13:53, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/15/2012 02:50 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-01-15 13:49, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 01/15/2012 02:44 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
OK, thanks.
As that repos is now the vgabios reference, nothing valuable can be lost
when we drop the kvm/ f
On 01/15/2012 02:50 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-01-15 13:49, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 01/15/2012 02:44 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> OK, thanks.
> >>
> >> As that repos is now the vgabios reference, nothing valuable can be lost
> >> when we drop the kvm/ folder, right?
> >>
> >
> > I guess so.
>
On 2012-01-15 13:49, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/15/2012 02:44 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> OK, thanks.
>>
>> As that repos is now the vgabios reference, nothing valuable can be lost
>> when we drop the kvm/ folder, right?
>>
>
> I guess so.
>
> What about extboot w/ -M pc-0.foo? I guess we'll boot wi
On 01/15/2012 02:44 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> OK, thanks.
>
> As that repos is now the vgabios reference, nothing valuable can be lost
> when we drop the kvm/ folder, right?
>
I guess so.
What about extboot w/ -M pc-0.foo? I guess we'll boot with a newer
seabios in any case, but we probably will h
On 2012-01-15 13:42, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/15/2012 02:39 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-01-15 13:33, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 01/15/2012 01:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi all,
the vgabios hash qemu-kvm points to does not exist in the referenced
repository. I was trying to fin
On 01/15/2012 02:39 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-01-15 13:33, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 01/15/2012 01:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> the vgabios hash qemu-kvm points to does not exist in the referenced
> >> repository. I was trying to find out the status of qemu-kvm's bios
> >> b
On 2012-01-15 13:33, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/15/2012 01:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> the vgabios hash qemu-kvm points to does not exist in the referenced
>> repository. I was trying to find out the status of qemu-kvm's bios
>> binaries and relevance of what is in the kvm/ folder. Loo
On 01/15/2012 01:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the vgabios hash qemu-kvm points to does not exist in the referenced
> repository. I was trying to find out the status of qemu-kvm's bios
> binaries and relevance of what is in the kvm/ folder. Looks like this is
> "a bit" messy...
I have 19e
Hi all,
the vgabios hash qemu-kvm points to does not exist in the referenced
repository. I was trying to find out the status of qemu-kvm's bios
binaries and relevance of what is in the kvm/ folder. Looks like this is
"a bit" messy...
Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
19 matches
Mail list logo
