On 10/14/2010 05:12 PM, Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
Thanks. Does this work for e1000 as well?
Haven't tried. I don't know how various e1000 drivers would react.
Also, does it support pci hotplug?
No, but that's fixable down the road.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Anjali
On 10/14/10
See my comments below, updated patch will follow later:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
...
+
+static int rbd_parsename(const char *filename, char *pool, char **snap,
+ char *name)
+{
+ const char *rbdname;
+ char
See my comments:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
+
+ cpu_to_le32s(snap_count);
+ cpu_to_le64s(snap_names_len);
Redone all endianity conversions, made it so that it keeps the header
as little endian, and whenever reading the header, do the
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 05:55:28PM +0900, Jin Dongming wrote:
There is no reason why SRAO event received by the main thread
is the only one that being broadcasted.
According to the x86 ASDM vol.3A 15.10.4.1,
MCE signal is broadcast on processor version 06H_EH or later.
This change is
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 05:49:43PM +0900, Jin Dongming wrote:
There are 2 similar functions to handle SIGBUS:
sigbus_handler(int n, struct qemu_signalfd_siginfo *siginfo,
void *ctx)
kvm_on_sigbus(CPUState *env, siginfo_t *siginfo)
The former is used when main thread
(2010/10/15 9:36), Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 05:49:43PM +0900, Jin Dongming wrote:
There are 2 similar functions to handle SIGBUS:
sigbus_handler(int n, struct qemu_signalfd_siginfo *siginfo,
void *ctx)
kvm_on_sigbus(CPUState *env, siginfo_t *siginfo)
Hi Kevin,
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:11, Kevin O'Connor ke...@koconnor.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 08:49:58AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/11/2010 07:53 PM, Ruben Kerkhof wrote:
5c99b6c984682ddb1d4543a7e27a1f4ca633e6a6 is the first bad commit
commit
(2010/10/15 10:06), Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 05:55:28PM +0900, Jin Dongming wrote:
There is no reason why SRAO event received by the main thread
is the only one that being broadcasted.
According to the x86 ASDM vol.3A 15.10.4.1,
MCE signal is broadcast on processor
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 23:19 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 14 October 2010 22:59:04 Alex Williamson wrote:
The structs in question only contain 4 8 byte elements, so there
shouldn't be any change on x86-32 using one-byte aligned packing.
I'm talking about the alignment of the
We can't let the compiler define the alignment for qemu_cfg data.
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson alex.william...@redhat.com
---
v2: Adjust alignment to help non-x86 hosts per Arnd's suggestion
0.13-stable candidate
hw/pc.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 09:52 +0800, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
(2010/10/15 10:06), Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 05:55:28PM +0900, Jin Dongming wrote:
There is no reason why SRAO event received by the main thread
is the only one that being broadcasted.
According to the x86
On 10/10/2010 12:44 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Hi Marcelo / Avi,
Scott has found some bugs in the BookE implementation of KVM, so please pull
the fixes for them to the kvm tree.
The following changes since commit 3c4504636ab1ff41ec162980bf85121aee14e58f:
Huang Ying (1):
KVM: MCE:
101 - 112 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
