From: Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/kernel/external-module-compat.h b/kernel/external-module-compat.h
index 4ba4bac..dfd90cf 100644
--- a/kernel/external-module-compat.h
+++ b/kernel/external-module-compat.h
@@ -53,6 +53,17 @@ int
From: Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/kernel/external-module-compat.c b/kernel/external-module-compat.c
index 84cdd40..084234d 100644
--- a/kernel/external-module-compat.c
+++ b/kernel/external-module-compat.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ static void
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Again, most likely a bad merge.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/qemu/block-vmdk.c b/qemu/block-vmdk.c
index 67dd2f1..843bf86 100644
--- a/qemu/block-vmdk.c
+++ b/qemu/block-vmdk.c
@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
If 'g' is one then limit is 4kb granular.
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: kvm-vmx-checks/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
===
--- kvm-vmx-checks.orig/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Subject says it all.
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: kvm-vmx-checks/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
===
--- kvm-vmx-checks.orig/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ kvm-vmx-checks/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -3253,6
Linus, please pull from the repo and branch:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/avi/kvm.git kvm-updates-2.6.27
to receive the 2.6.27 merge window kvm updates. Changes include mmio
coalescing, x86 emulator updates, nmi support, mtrr emualtion, and
some kvmtrace work.
Shortlog,
On 07/20, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Suppose that the signal was already dequeued but sigq-info wasn't copied
to the user-space.
To avoid a possible confusion: this is of course fine by itself, the content
of sigq-info was already copied to the local siginfo.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this
Mohammed Gamal wrote:
With the unpredictable behaviour of the current vmentry failure patch,
I think this is caused by external interrupts from the host, and since
this is hard to control I was thinking of handling vmentry failure in
userspace. The way I am thinking of doing it is that once a
Avi Kivity wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
No, the whitespace is in QEMU SVN. It somehow got removed from the
kvm-userspace tree.
Well, perhaps send the reversed patch to qemu-devel as a bugfix?
Eh, removing a line of whitespace is not really a bugfix. Maybe the
double line was
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:22:07PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
If 'g' is one then limit is 4kb granular.
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: kvm-vmx-checks/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
===
---
Hi!
Please can you consider to import in kvm-userspace the native vde support
from qemu (svn revision 4896) ?
This e-mail tries to explain a bit the current situation:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2008-07/msg00026.html
Thank you!
luca
--
Beware of programmers who carry
Luca Bigliardi wrote:
Hi!
Please can you consider to import in kvm-userspace the native vde support
from qemu (svn revision 4896) ?
Out of curiosity, do you actually use VDE for distributed ethernet or
just as an easy way to configure networking?
I actually liked the libpcap patch as a
Ciao David,
thank you for the answer, but...
AFAIK, -net user does not need an ifname or script argument -
there's no host interface for the user mode stack. Try these:
kvm -name PROXY
-net nic,vlan=0,macaddr=00:18:BE:EF:17:2A,model=rtl8139
-net
Ciao Uri:
Does using a different ifname help ?
PROXY: ifname=tap2 and dmz2
WEBAPP: ifname=tap1 and dmz1
DB: ifname=tap0 and dmz0
no, it doesn't.
always
destination host unreachable
Also check route on guests.
yes, they are correct, the default to external network eth0 while all
eth1
Yes, thanks, I see. But does it have any meaning for the user-space?
[si_sys_private]
No, it's not part of the user ABI. It's not even copied out (see
copy_siginfo_to_user). (A spare siginfo_t field was just used as a handy
bit of storage in the signal queue element. It's a kludge.)
Let me
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:59 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Out of curiosity, do you actually use VDE for distributed ethernet or
just as an easy way to configure networking?
I use VDE daily even for non virtual-machine purposes like low bandwidth
vpns, ipv6 tunnel broker, network experiments
Paolo Pedaletti wrote:
Ciao Uri:
Does using a different ifname help ?
PROXY: ifname=tap2 and dmz2
WEBAPP: ifname=tap1 and dmz1
DB: ifname=tap0 and dmz0
no, it doesn't.
always
destination host unreachable
Also check route on guests.
yes, they are correct, the default to external
On Jul 20, 2008, at 10:07 PM, David Mair wrote:
Paolo Pedaletti wrote:
Ciao Uri:
Does using a different ifname help ?
PROXY: ifname=tap2 and dmz2
WEBAPP: ifname=tap1 and dmz1
DB: ifname=tap0 and dmz0
no, it doesn't.
always
destination host unreachable
Also check route on guests.
yes,
18 matches
Mail list logo