On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:41:03PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Guest: Debian lenny. Linux 2.6.26, Debian version (I can provide
config or bzImage + initrd).
Yes please provide. Debian lenny (x86_64) is my default guest :) And I
just booted it fine on AMD barcelona CPU. What is you host cpu?
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 18:45 +0800, Avi Kivity wrote:
Huang Ying wrote:
I'm okay with an ioctl to setup MCE, but just make sure userspace has
all the information to know what the kernel can do rather than the
try-and-see-if-it-works approach. We can publish this information via
KVM_CAP
2009/4/14 Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:29:49PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
2009/4/14 Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 06:32:29PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
2009/4/14 Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 01:30:29PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
2009/4/14 Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:29:49PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
2009/4/14 Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 06:32:29PM +0400, Dmitry
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 01:30:29PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
qemu-x86_64 version 0.10.2 running on i386
Due to problems with qemu-x86_64 I have to boot the 'host' kernel with
'noapic'.
Do you mean boot 'guest' kernel with noapic? The guest is what runs
inside qemu. So you are able
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 01:30:29PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
2009/4/14 Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:29:49PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
2009/4/14 Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 06:32:29PM +0400,
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:22:34PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 01:30:29PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
2009/4/14 Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:29:49PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
2009/4/14 Gleb Natapov
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:22:34PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 01:30:29PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
2009/4/14 Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:29:49PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:51:00PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
I need _host_ cpu info. Do the same on the host please.
That _is_ his host - qemu in emulation mode (ie. nested virtualization).
Ah, now I noticed svm in cpu flags. Does qemu support svm in TCG?
Yes, and KVM seems to have been
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 01:30:29PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
qemu-x86_64 version 0.10.2 running on i386
Due to problems with qemu-x86_64 I have to boot the 'host' kernel with 'noapic'.
Do you mean boot 'guest' kernel with noapic? The guest is what runs
inside
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 03:09:25PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 06:58:40 +0300
Izik Eidus iei...@redhat.com wrote:
replace_page() allow changing the mapping of pte from one physical page
into diffrent physical page.
At a high level, this is very similar to what page
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 01:30:29PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
qemu-x86_64 version 0.10.2 running on i386
Due to problems with qemu-x86_64 I have to boot the 'host' kernel
with 'noapic'.
Do you mean boot 'guest' kernel with noapic?
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov пишет:
Jan Kiszka пишет:
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 01:30:29PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
qemu-x86_64 version 0.10.2 running on i386
Due to problems with qemu-x86_64 I have to boot the 'host' kernel
with
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 03:53:40PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
Jan Kiszka пишет:
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 01:30:29PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
qemu-x86_64 version 0.10.2 running on i386
Due to problems with qemu-x86_64 I
Gleb Natapov пишет:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 03:53:40PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
Jan Kiszka пишет:
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 01:30:29PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
qemu-x86_64 version 0.10.2 running on i386
Due to
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
Jan Kiszka пишет:
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 01:30:29PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
qemu-x86_64 version 0.10.2 running on i386
Due to problems with qemu-x86_64 I have to boot the 'host' kernel
with
Jan Kiszka пишет:
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 01:30:29PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
qemu-x86_64 version 0.10.2 running on i386
Due to problems with qemu-x86_64 I have to boot the 'host' kernel
with 'noapic'.
Do you mean boot 'guest'
Bugs item #2765323, was opened at 2009-04-15 14:27
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by scoof
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=893831aid=2765323group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
Jan Kiszka пишет:
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
Jan Kiszka пишет:
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 01:30:29PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
qemu-x86_64 version 0.10.2 running on i386
Due to problems with qemu-x86_64 I have to boot the
Matt T. Yourst notes that kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_sregs lacks validity
checking for the new cr3 value:
Userspace callers of KVM_SET_SREGS can pass a bogus value of cr3 to
the kernel. This will trigger a NULL pointer access in gfn_to_rmap()
when userspace next tries to call KVM_RUN on the
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 06:58:41 +0300
Izik Eidus iei...@redhat.com wrote:
Confused. In the covering email you indicated that v2 of the patchset
had abandoned ioctls and had moved the interface to sysfs.
We have abandoned the ioctls that control the ksm behavior (how
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:37:25 +0300
Izik Eidus iei...@redhat.com wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 06:58:41 +0300
Izik Eidus iei...@redhat.com wrote:
Confused. In the covering email you indicated that v2 of the patchset
had abandoned ioctls and had moved the
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 03:50:58PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
an optional thing and can even be modprobed, that doesn't work. And
having a driver in mm/ which can be modprobed is kinda neat.
Agreed. I think madvise with all its vma split requirements and
ksm-unregistering invoked at vma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Wireshark was showing a huge amount of invalid packets (wrong checksum)
- - that was the cause of the slowdown.
Simply rebooting the host into 2.6.28.9 fixed *everything*, regardless
of whether the guests use virtio or ne2k_pci/etc.
The guests are
Andrew Morton wrote:
+static pte_t *get_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
+{
+ pgd_t *pgd;
+ pud_t *pud;
+ pmd_t *pmd;
+ pte_t *ptep = NULL;
+
+ pgd = pgd_offset(mm, addr);
+ if (!pgd_present(*pgd))
+ goto out;
+
+ pud =
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
+static pte_t *get_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
+{
+pgd_t *pgd;
+pud_t *pud;
+pmd_t *pmd;
+pte_t *ptep = NULL;
+
+pgd = pgd_offset(mm, addr);
+if (!pgd_present(*pgd))
+goto out;
+
+pud =
Bugs item #2763707, was opened at 2009-04-15 00:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by subhraveti
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=893831aid=2763707group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Can any one run OpenBSD 4.5[1,2] under kvm ?
I run OpenBSD 4.4 under Debian 5.0 amd64(linux 2.6.26 with kvm-72)
fine, and snapshots older than 2009-04.
The new snapshots can install smoothly, but stopped at
display 'setting tty flags'.
[1] ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/i386/
[2]
Can any one run OpenBSD 4.5[1,2] under kvm ?
I run OpenBSD 4.4 under Debian 5.0 amd64(linux 2.6.26 with kvm-72)
fine, and snapshots older than 2009-04.
The new snapshots can install smoothly, but stopped at
display 'setting tty flags'.
[1]
You might want to try 84 with oos optimization off (or better yet 85 when it
comes out). There was a bug recently (post 84) fixed that affected some BSDs.
On Wednesday 15 April 2009 22:51:13 Dongsheng Song wrote:
Can any one run OpenBSD 4.5[1,2] under kvm ?
I run OpenBSD 4.4 under Debian
30 matches
Mail list logo
