On 2011-02-21 02:09, yajin wrote:
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de wrote:
On 2011-02-20 14:08, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 07:32:31PM -0500, yajin wrote:
Hi all,
Hi,
I have proposed an idea of GSOC 2011 about adding KVM support to MIPS
Hi Green,
2011/2/21 ya su suya94...@gmail.com:
Yoshiaki:
I have one question about ram_save_live, during migration 3
stage(completation stage), it will call
cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_tracking(0) to stop recording ram dirty pages.
at the end of migrate_ft_trans_connect function, it
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:47:36AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
Atomic-able hva_to_pfn() patches and allow-read-only-page patches
are merged almost the same time. But hva_to_pfn() does not handle
these two issues well together.
When @atomic !@write_fault host-is-read-only-page-mapped
the
When vm86 is active TR descriptor is updated with vm86 task values,
but selector is left intact. vmx_set_segment() makes sure that if TR
register is written into while vm86 is active the new values are saved
for use after vm86 is deactivated, but since selector is not updated on
vm86
Currently vm86 task is initialized on each real mode entry and vcpu
reset. Initialization is done by zeroing TSS and updating relevant
fields. But since all vcpus are using the same TSS there is a race where
one vcpu may use TSS while other vcpu is initializing it, so the vcpu
that uses TSS will
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
diff --git a/qemu-kvm.c b/qemu-kvm.c
index 49cd683..2f3f683 100644
--- a/qemu-kvm.c
+++ b/qemu-kvm.c
@@ -644,8 +644,7 @@ int kvm_run(CPUState *env)
break;
#endif
case KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR:
-
Support statements such as:
ide: only unattended_install
which is just a short form for
ide:
only unattended_install
Currently the short form is supported only for assignment statements.
This patch allows it to be used for all types of statements.
Note: multiple filters can be combined on
Looking for str is a mistake because content should only contains Ops and
Filters. This is a harmless bug but it should be fixed.
Signed-off-by: Michael Goldish mgold...@redhat.com
---
client/tests/kvm/kvm_config.py |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
If the filter starting a conditional block is preceded by '!', the condition is
negative. For example:
!Fedora.14, RHEL.6.0:
only qcow2
means for everything except Fedora.14 and RHEL.6.0, allow only qcow2.
Signed-off-by: Michael Goldish mgold...@redhat.com
---
This avoids that early cpu_synchronize_state calls try to retrieve an
uninitialized state from the kernel, which even causes a deadlock.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
Corresponding upstream patch will come with next uq/master series.
qemu-kvm.c |1 +
1 files changed,
Hello everyone,
I'm not sure if this is the correct mailing list with my topic. But the
website says that end user's questions are welcome. So please give me a
hint if this is the wrong place.
On the host:
# rpm -qa | grep kvm
kvm-0.12.5-1.2.1.x86_64
# uname -a
Linux alphawkst
On 02/21/2011 12:16 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapovg...@redhat.com
diff --git a/qemu-kvm.c b/qemu-kvm.c
index 49cd683..2f3f683 100644
--- a/qemu-kvm.c
+++ b/qemu-kvm.c
@@ -644,8 +644,7 @@ int kvm_run(CPUState *env)
break;
#endif
case
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 02:24:19PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 02/21/2011 12:16 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapovg...@redhat.com
diff --git a/qemu-kvm.c b/qemu-kvm.c
index 49cd683..2f3f683 100644
--- a/qemu-kvm.c
+++ b/qemu-kvm.c
@@ -644,8 +644,7 @@ int kvm_run(CPUState
In installer.py, we realized that we could benefit from having
the unittests build in pretty much all build types, after all,
if the userspace is sufficiently new we can run the unittests,
regardless of the way the binaries were build.
Encapsulate the unittests build and install to a method and
On 2011-02-21 13:25, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 02:24:19PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 02/21/2011 12:16 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapovg...@redhat.com
diff --git a/qemu-kvm.c b/qemu-kvm.c
index 49cd683..2f3f683 100644
--- a/qemu-kvm.c
+++ b/qemu-kvm.c
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:07:54 +0100, Thomas Broda tho...@bassfimass.de
wrote:
I will try Fedora then.
I've installed Fedora 14 on the hypervisor last weekend, and the disk
performance is as bad as it used to be under Centos 5.5.
I think this related to the RAID controller. A Google search for
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 01:53:15PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-02-21 13:25, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 02:24:19PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 02/21/2011 12:16 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapovg...@redhat.com
diff --git a/qemu-kvm.c b/qemu-kvm.c
Signed-off-by: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues l...@redhat.com
---
client/tests/kvm/control |7 ++-
client/tests/kvm/kvm_utils.py |9 ++---
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/client/tests/kvm/control b/client/tests/kvm/control
index be37678..d9ff70c
please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
thanks, Juan.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
(Sorry for the delay, I had to spend some days sick at home :-( )
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 05:12:29PM -0500, Zachary Amsden wrote:
On 02/09/2011 12:29 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
So I've gone over this series and the only issue I see so far is with
this patch, and it doesn't have to do with
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:12:14AM -0500, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 02/09/2011 07:29 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
This patch implements two new vm-ioctls to get and set the
virtual_tsc_khz if the machine supports tsc-scaling. Setting
the tsc-frequency is only possible before userspace creates
any
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:19:19AM -0500, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 02/09/2011 07:29 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
Hi Avi, Marcelo,
here is the patch-set to implement the TSC-scaling feature of upcoming
AMD CPUs. When this feature is supported the CPU provides a new MSR
which holds a multiplier
On 02/21/2011 11:12 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
- 0.14.0 release is out, thanks to everyone that participated! Let's
discuss what worked well, what could be improved.
- 0.15 planning
- Should we do a bump to 1.0?
-
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 16:04 +, James Neave wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:17 AM, James Neave robo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Kenni Lund ke...@kelu.dk wrote:
2011/2/7 Daniel P.
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 20:31 +, James Neave wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 16:04 +, James Neave wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:17 AM, James Neave robo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:59
On 02/21/2011 12:28 PM, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:19:19AM -0500, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 02/09/2011 07:29 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
Hi Avi, Marcelo,
here is the patch-set to implement the TSC-scaling feature of upcoming
AMD CPUs. When this feature is supported the
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:49 PM, James Neave robo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:25 PM, James Neave robo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 20:31 +, James Neave wrote:
On Mon, Feb
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:55 PM, James Neave robo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:49 PM, James Neave robo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:25 PM, James Neave robo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:25 PM, James Neave robo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 20:31 +, James Neave wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 20:31 +, James Neave wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 16:04 +, James Neave wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8,
* Alex Williamson (alex.william...@redhat.com) wrote:
I don't know why you're getting -EBUSY for this device, but maybe we can
start from a clean slate and see if it helps. Here's what I would
suggest:
I bet this is an AMD IOMMU box. Can we get full dmesg?
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Chris Wright chr...@sous-sol.org wrote:
* Alex Williamson (alex.william...@redhat.com) wrote:
I don't know why you're getting -EBUSY for this device, but maybe we can
start from a clean slate and see if it helps. Here's what I would
suggest:
I bet this is
* James Neave (robo...@gmail.com) wrote:
Finally, here is the very latest dmesg:
http://pastebin.com/9HE61K62
OK, this is an AMD IOMMU box.
[0.00] ACPI: IVRS cfcf9830 000E0 (v01 AMD RD890S 00202031
AMD )
It's discovered and enalbed properly:
[0.698992]
33 matches
Mail list logo
